AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by March, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Makari-Judson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by March, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Makari-Judson, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 697-701, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Use of breast core biopsy in the United States: results of a national survey

DE March, A Raslavicus, BF Coughlin, SV Klein and G Makari-Judson
Department of Radiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the results of a national survey to determine the current use and practice of breast core biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was mailed to 1700 members of the Society of Breast Imaging who reside in the United States. The questions included frequency of biopsy, specialty of responsible physician, type of guidance used, physician credentialing, method and duration of follow- up, referral patterns, scheduling practices, and types of lesions biopsied. Opinions about the future usefulness of breast core biopsy were solicited. RESULTS: We received 458 responses (27% response rate) from 48 states and the District of Columbia. Eighty-one percent of the respondents indicated that breast core biopsy is performed at their practice or institution: among these, 85% are performed solely by radiologists. Of those performing the procedure, 61% do not have special credentials. Seventy-one percent use both stereotaxic and sonographic guidance. For follow-up after the procedure, patients are tracked manually and by computer in near-equal proportions. The median period of patient follow-up is 12 months: 11% of the respondents track indefinitely. Surgeons and primary care physicians most commonly refer patients for core biopsy. The procedure is most often performed after notification of the referring physician (76%), and 80% of the respondents schedule core biopsy without prior surgical consultation. Masses and calcifications categorized as probably benign to highly suspicious are included as indications for core biopsy. Forty percent of the respondents offer core biopsy on the same visit as when an abnormality is found. Eighty percent of the respondents believe the procedure will increase in use 48% believe that core biopsy will replace most surgical biopsies for nonpalpable lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Breast core biopsy is widely used in the United States for sampling a broad spectrum of imaging abnormalities. Both sonographic and stereotaxic guidance are commonly used. Credentialing requirements, practice patterns, and follow-up after the core biopsy procedure vary considerably among different sites.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. R. Yabroff, E. Ashbeck, and R. Rosenberg
Trends in Time to Completion of Mammographic Screening and Follow-Up Services
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 242 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Ondategui-Parra, J. G. Bhagwat, K. H. Zou, A. Gogate, L. A. Intriere, P. Kelly, S. E. Seltzer, and P. R. Ros
Practice Management Performance Indicators in Academic Radiology Departments
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 716 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. E. March, B. F. Coughlin, R. B. Barham, R. A. Goulart, S. V. Klein, M. E. Bur, J. L. Frank, and G. Makari-Judson
Breast Masses: Removal of All US Evidence during Biopsy by Using a Handheld Vacuum-assisted Device--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Guenin and F. R. Margolin
Full Disclosure of Breast Biopsy Options
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1029 - 1030.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Becker, D. Taves, L. McCurdy, G. Muscedere, S. Karlik, and S. Ward
Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Comparison of Film Versus Digital Mammography, Both Using an Add-On Unit
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1451 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. R. Margolin, J. W. T. Leung, R. P. Jacobs, and S. R. Denny
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: 5 Years' Experience in a Community Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 559 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. Lee, L. E. Philpotts, L. J. Horvath, and I. Tocino
Follow-up of Breast Lesions Diagnosed as Benign with Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy: Frequency of Mammographic Change and False-Negative Rate
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.