AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birdwell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birdwell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 703-707, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Preliminary experience with power Doppler imaging of solid breast masses

RL Birdwell, DM Ikeda, SS Jeffrey and RB Jeffrey Jr
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5105, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the potential of power Doppler imaging (PDI) to differentiate benign from malignant solid breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine biopsy-proven solid breast masses were evaluated with PDI using 7- to 10-MHz transducers optimized for low-volume flow sensitivity. The extent of flow on PDI was estimated as a percentage of the lesion area on multiple longitudinal and transverse static sonographic images. Flow was categorized as avascular; less than 10%; 10-25%; 25.1-50%; and greater than 50%. RESULTS: Of the 69 lesions evaluated, 33 were malignant and 36 were benign. Of the avascular lesions, nine were malignant and eight were benign. Significant overlap was seen in the vascularity of the other 52 lesions: both malignant and benign lesions revealed a similar range of vascular patterns. CONCLUSION: Preliminary experience with PDI suggests that both malignant and benign lesions can be avascular and that the presence of color within a solid breast mass is a nonspecific finding. Assessing the extent of vascularity with PDI appears to be of limited value in the diagnostic evaluation of solid breast masses.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R.-F. Chang, S.-F. Huang, W. K. Moon, Y.-H. Lee, and D.-R. Chen
Solid Breast Masses: Neural Network Analysis of Vascular Features at Three-dimensional Power Doppler US for Benign or Malignant Classification
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 56 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. L. del Cura, E. Elizagaray, R. Zabala, A. Legorburu, and D. Grande
The Use of Unenhanced Doppler Sonography in the Evaluation of Solid Breast Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1788 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Santamaria, M. Velasco, X. Farre, J. A. Vanrell, A. Cardesa, and P. L. Fernandez
Power Doppler Sonography of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Does Tumor Vascularization Contribute to Prediction of Axillary Status?
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. P. Weinstein, E. F. Conant, C. M. Sehgal, I. P. Woo, and J. A. Patton
Hormonal Variations in the Vascularity of Breast Tissue
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Stuhrmann, R. Aronius, and M. Schietzel
Tumor Vascularity of Breast Lesions: Potentials and Limits of Contrast-Enhanced Doppler Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1585 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, J.-G. Im, D.-Y. Noh, and M. C. Han
Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Evaluation with Power Doppler US and a Microbubble Contrast Agent-Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 240 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Fischer, L. Kopka, and E. Grabbe
Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. D. Pisano, M. P. Braeuning, and E. Burke
Case 8: Solitary Intraductal Papilloma
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 795 - 798.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.