AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bernreuter, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bernreuter, W. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 713-715, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Mammography of breasts in which catheter cuffs have been retained: normal, infected, and postoperative appearances

RL Ellis, PJ Dempsey, E Rubin, NS Pile and WK Bernreuter
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35233, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to show that Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) cuffs retained in breasts after the removal of Hickman catheters may result in complications requiring radiographic evaluation for subsequent management. We also describe potential complications, including infection, associated with a retained cuff and changes after the removal of a retained cuff. CONCLUSION: Because of the increased use of Hickman catheters for central vein access, Dacron cuffs more frequently are retained in breasts and are likely to be seen on mammograms. Radiologists need to be aware of the mammographic findings of a normal cuff, infected cuff, and the site of a surgically excised cuff.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 radtechHome page
J. MINIGH
Mammographic Film Artifacts.
Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2006; 77(5): 389M - 402M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A M Barnacle and A W M Mitchell
Technical report: use of ultrasound guidance in the removal of tunnelled venous access catheter cuffs
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2005; 78(926): 147 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
M. D. Kohli, S. O. Trerotola, J. Namyslowski, M. S. Stecker, G. McLennan, N. H. Patel, M. S. Johnson, H. Shah, and R. Seshadri
Outcome of Polyester Cuff Retention Following Traction Removal of Tunneled Central Venous Catheters
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 651 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, J. M. Park, J.-G. Im, D.-Y. Noh, K. M. Yeon, and M. C. Han
Metallic Punctate Densities in the Breast after Chinese Herbal Treatment: Mammographic Findings
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 890 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
J. P. Hogge, C. H. Palmer, C. C. Muller, S. T. Little, D. C. Smith, P. P. Fatouros, and E. S. de Paredes
Quality Assurance in Mammography: Artifact Analysis
RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 503 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.