|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 749-754, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
JC Steffens, J Link, S Muller-Hulsbeck, M Freund, G Brinkmann and M Heller
Department of Radiology, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our capability to use coronally acquired, cardiac-gated two-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography (MRA) to correctly detect and grade arteriosclerotic lesions from the aortic bifurcation to the popliteal artery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with a total of 253 arteriosclerotic lesions proven by intraarterial digital subtraction angiography were examined prospectively by two-dimensional phase- contrast MRA. MRA was performed from the aortic bifurcation to the popliteal trifurcation. Imaging parameters were TR/TE, 83/9 msec; flip angle, 11 degrees; matrix, 256 x 192; acquisitions, two; slice thickness, 80 mm; and field of view, 320 mm. ECG gating was used routinely and eight to 10 phases were acquired during the cardiac cycle. Velocity encoding was set to 30 cm/sec in the iliac arteries and to 20 cm/sec in the femoral and popliteal arteries. Detected stenoses were graded in the following manner: 1% to less than 50% stenosis, group 1; 50% to less than 75% stenosis, group 2; 75% to less than 100% stenosis, group 3; and total occlusion, group 4. RESULTS: All arteriosclerotic lesions were revealed by MRA. Two hundred seventeen of 253 lesions were also graded correctly. Sensitivity was 95%, specificity was 90%, positive predictive value was 90%, and negative predictive value was 96%. The weighted kappa index was (.92). Sensitivity and specificity for occlusions were both 100%; for high- grade stenoses, 94% and 91%, respectively; for moderate stenoses, 84% and 94%, respectively; and for mild stenoses, 79% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional phase-contrast MRA can provide MR angiograms with high sensitivity and specificity for high- grade stenoses in a reasonable amount of time in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Miyazaki and V. S. Lee Nonenhanced MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 20 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Schaefer, F. P. Boudghene, H. J. Brambs, M. Bret-Zurita, J. L. Caniego, R. A. Coulden, H. B. Gehl, R. Hammerstingl, A. Huber, R. J. Mendez, et al. Abdominal and Iliac Arterial Stenoses: Comparative Double-blinded Randomized Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D MR Angiography with Gadodiamide or Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 827 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. W. Koelemay, J. G. Lijmer, J. Stoker, D. A. Legemate, and P. M. M. Bossuyt Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: A Meta-analysis JAMA, March 14, 2001; 285(10): 1338 - 1345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Rofsky and M. A. Adelman MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 325 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Link, J. C. Steffens, J. Brossmann, J. Graessner, S. Hackethal, and M. Heller Iliofemoral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography for Preinterventional Evaluation and Follow-up after Stent Placement Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 371 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |