|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1015-1018, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
JE Lim-Dunham, J Narra, EC Benya and JS Donaldson
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA. J.E.Lim- Dunham
OBJECTIVE: The practice of routinely administering oral contrast material to children undergoing abdominal CT for blunt trauma is controversial, primarily because of the increased risk of aspiration. The purpose of this study was to determine how often aspiration occurs in this population of children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 50 children who underwent abdominal CT scans after blunt trauma. All children received diluted 3% water-soluble oral contrast material. The medical record of each child was reviewed for evidence of aspiration pneumonia as many as 48 hr after the CT. In each patient, sections of the CT scan through the lung bases were examined for opacities. When lung opacities were identified, they were classified as atelectasis, confusion, laceration, or nonspecific. We made attenuation measurements of lung opacities larger than 1 cm, and each measurement was compared with the attenuation measurement of contrast material in that patient's stomach. Student's two-tailed t test was used to compare the two measurements. RESULTS: Four patients were febrile after the CT scan, but in none was aspiration pneumonia suspected to be the cause. The remaining 46 patients did not have any clinical evidence of aspiration. Twelve of the 50 patients had pulmonary opacities revealed by CT that were sufficiently large that attenuation measurements could be obtained. The opacity in one of these patients was classified as nonspecific, and the attenuation was as high as that of contrast material in the stomach. CONCLUSION: No clinically symptomatic episodes of aspiration pneumonia were found in 50 pediatric patients with blunt trauma who were given oral contrast material for abdominal CT. Although one of the children had CT findings that suggested clinically silent aspiration of oral contrast material, no evidence was found that administration of oral contrast material was harmful.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. P. Wood Water for GI Contrast in Trauma CT AAP Grand Rounds, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 33 - 33. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Halsted, J. M. Racadio, K. H. Emery, P. Kreymerman, S. A. Poe, J. A. Bean, and L. F. Donnelly Oral Contrast Agents for CT of Abdominal Trauma in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Dilute Hypaque and Water Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1555 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ziegler, B. L. Fricke, and L. F. Donnelly Is Administration of Enteric Contrast Material Safe Before Abdominal CT in Children Who Require Sedation? Experience with Chloral Hydrate and Pentobarbital Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 13 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Vane, M. S. Keller, K. H. Sartorelli, and A. P. Miceli Pediatric Trauma: Current Concepts and Treatments J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 230 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Butela, M. P. Federle, P. J. Chang, F. L. Thaete, M. S. Peterson, C. J. Dorvault, A. K. Hari, S. Soni, B. F. Branstetter, K. J. Paisley, et al. Performance of CT in Detection of Bowel Injury Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 129 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Strouse, B. J. Close, K. W. Marshall, and R. Cywes CT of Bowel and Mesenteric Trauma in Children RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1237 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Splinter and M. S. Schreiner Preoperative Fasting in Children Anesth. Analg., July 1, 1999; 89(1): 80 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |