AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royster, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Royster, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1237-1242, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three- dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation

AP Royster, HM Fenlon, PD Clarke, DP Nunes and JT Ferrucci
Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) CT colonography and three-dimensional (3D) virtual colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy in patients who have suspected colorectal neoplasms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were studied (eight women and 12 men; mean age, 53 years; range, 42-85 years). All patients had findings on conventional colonoscopy suggestive of colorectal carcinoma and underwent colonic CT within 3 hr of endoscopy. Two-dimensional CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy images were generated from the same data set that was obtained from thin-section helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis after rectal insufflation of room air. Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy images were obtained by downloading CT data to a workstation equipped with commercially available software. Volume- and perspective-rendering techniques were used to achieve interactive, 3D virtual "fly-through" examinations of the colonic mucosa. The results of 2D CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy were compared with the findings of conventional colonoscopy and correlated with surgical and pathologic outcome where possible. RESULTS: Twenty masses (defined as intraluminal projections 2 cm or larger in diameter) and 15 polyps (defined as projections smaller than 2 cm in diameter) were identified in our study group. All masses and 14 of 15 polyps were successfully shown on 2D colonography. Three findings of polyps on 2D colonography were false- positive, and one was false-negative. Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy revealed 19 of 20 masses and 13 of 15 polyps. On conventional colonoscopy, all 20 masses and 13 of 15 polyps were identified, with one false-positive finding of a malignant stricture in a normal colon. Complete examination of the colon was possible in 18 of 20 patients using the 2D technique and in 17 of 20 patients using 3D virtual colonoscopy, whereas conventional colonoscopy showed the entire colon in only 12 of 20 patients. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy are complementary and effective techniques for examining the colon in patients with suspected colorectal carcinoma. CT techniques offer several advantages over conventional colonoscopy including the ability to detect abnormalities proximal to obstructing carcinomas, accurate localization of abnormalities within the colon, and good patient tolerance. These CT techniques may play an important role in future diagnosis of colorectal cancer and for screening patients at risk.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Sosna, T. Sella, O. Sy, P. T. Lavin, R. Eliahou, S. Fraifeld, and E. Libson
Critical Analysis of the Performance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Detecting Colorectal Polyps >= 6 mm in the Era of CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 374 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B Saar, A Meining, A Beer, M Settles, H Helmberger, E Frimberger, E J Rummeny, and T Rosch
Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SURG INNOVHome page
C. Torres, S. Szomstein, and S. D. Wexner
Virtual Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 27 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Mang, A. Maier, C. Plank, C. Mueller-Mang, C. Herold, and W. Schima
Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 431 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. G. Mang, C. Schaefer-Prokop, A. Maier, E. Schober, G. Lechner, and M. Prokop
Detectability of Small and Flat Polyps in MDCT Colonography Using 2D and 3D Imaging Tools: Results from a Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1582 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari and E. J. Bini
CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 819 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, A. K. Hara, J. A. Leighton, and J. P. Heppell
CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1321 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
B. P. Mulhall, G. R. Veerappan, and J. L. Jackson
Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography
Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 635 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Hoppe, C. Quattropani, A. Spreng, J. Mattich, P. Netzer, and H.-P. Dinkel
Virtual Colon Dissection with CT Colonography Compared with Axial Interpretation and Conventional Colonoscopy: Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1151 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Sosna, M. M. Morrin, J. B. Kruskal, P. T. Lavin, M. P. Rosen, and V. Raptopoulos
CT Colonography of Colorectal Polyps: A Metaanalysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1593 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, P. R. Morgan, I. C. Talbot, N. Fry, B. P. Saunders, K. Khosraviani, and W. Atkin
Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: Effect of Collimation, Pitch, and Orientation on Polyp Detection in a Human Colectomy Specimen
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Vos, R. E. van Gelder, I. W. O. Serlie, J. Florie, C. Y. Nio, A. S. Glas, F. H. Post, R. Truyen, F. A. Gerritsen, and J. Stoker
Three-dimensional Display Modes for CT Colonography: Conventional 3D Virtual Colonoscopy versus Unfolded Cube Projection
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 878 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Sosna, M. M. Morrin, J. B. Kruskal, R. J. Farrell, I. Nasser, and V. Raptopoulos
Colorectal Neoplasms: Role of Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT Colonography
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. Levin, D. Brooks, R. A. Smith, and A. Stone
Emerging Technologies in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: CT Colonography, Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests, and Stool Screening Using Molecular Markers
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2003; 53(1): 44 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. McFarland, T. K. Pilgram, J. A. Brink, R. A. McDermott, C. V. Santillan, P. W. Brady, J. P. Heiken, D. M. Balfe, L. B. Weinstock, E. P. Thyssen, et al.
CT Colonography: Multiobserver Diagnostic Performance
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 380 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari, E. J. Bini, X. Xue, A. Milano, S. S. Katz, D. Resnick, H. Chandarana, G. Krinsky, K. Klingenbeck, C. H. Marshall, et al.
Colorectal Neoplasms: Prospective Comparison of Thin-Section Low-Dose Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy for Detection
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 383 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Yoshida, J. Nappi, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman
Computer-aided Diagnosis Scheme for Detection of Polyps at CT Colonography
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 963 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Neri, P. Giusti, L. Battolla, P. Vagli, P. Boraschi, R. Lencioni, D. Caramella, and C. Bartolozzi
Colorectal Cancer: Role of CT Colonography in Preoperative Evaluation after Incomplete Colonoscopy
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 615 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N P Power, M D Pryor, A Martin, J Horrocks, A M McLean, and R H Reznek
Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography
Br. J. Radiol., May 31, 2002; 75(893): 401 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. T. Ferrucci
Colon Cancer Screening with Virtual Colonoscopy: Promise, Polyps, Politics
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 975 - 988.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Zalis, P. F. Hahn, R. S. Arellano, G. S. Gazelle, and P. R. Mueller
CT Colonography with Teleradiology: Effect of Lossy Wavelet Compression on Polyp Detection—Initial Observations
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 387 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. R. Callstrom, C. D. Johnson, J. G. Fletcher, J. E. Reed, D. A. Ahlquist, W. S. Harmsen, K. Tait, L. A. Wilson, and K. E. Corcoran
CT Colonography without Cathartic Preparation: Feasibility Study
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 693 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Summers, C. D. Johnson, L. M. Pusanik, J. D. Malley, A. M. Youssef, and J. E. Reed
Automated Polyp Detection at CT Colonography: Feasibility Assessment in a Human Population
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 51 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. McFarland, J. A. Brink, T. K. Pilgram, J. P. Heiken, D. M. Balfe, D. A. Hirselj, L. Weinstock, and B. Littenberg
Spiral CT Colonography: Reader Agreement and Diagnostic Performance with Two- and Three-dimensional Image-Display Techniques
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A H Freeman
CT and bowel disease
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 4 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari, M. Lavelle, I. Pedrosa, A. Milano, M. Dicker, A. J. Megibow, and X. Xue
Effect of Different Bowel Preparations on Residual Fluid at CT Colonography
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 274 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. R. Whiting, E. G. McFarland, and J. A. Brink
Influence of Image Acquisition Parameters on CT Artifacts and Polyp Depiction in Spiral CT Colonography: In Vitro Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 165 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Fletcher, C. D. Johnson, T. J. Welch, R. L. MacCarty, D. A. Ahlquist, J. E. Reed, W. S. Harmsen, and L. A. Wilson
Optimization of CT Colonography Technique: Prospective Trial in 180 Patients
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 704 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Johnson and A. H. Dachman
CT Colonography: The Next Colon Screening Examination?
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 331 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
P Pescatore, T Glucker, J Delarive, R Meuli, D Pantoflickova, B Duvoisin, P Schnyder, A L Blum, and G Dorta
Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy)
Gut, July 1, 2000; 47(1): 126 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Summers, C. F. Beaulieu, L. M. Pusanik, J. D. Malley, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, D. I. Glazer, and S. Napel
Automated Polyp Detector for CT Colonography: Feasibility Study
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 284 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. T. Ferrucci
CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Lessons from Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1539 - 1541.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, A. Milano, M. Lavelle, P. Berman, and A. J. Megibow
Comparison of Time-Efficient CT Colonography with Two-and Three-Dimensional Colonic Evaluation for Detecting Colorectal Polyps
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1543 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. M. Fenlon, D. P. Nunes, P. C. Schroy, M. A. Barish, P. D. Clarke, and J. T. Ferrucci
A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps
N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 1999; 341(20): 1496 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Halligan and H. M Fenlon
Science, medicine, and the future: Virtual colonoscopy
BMJ, November 6, 1999; 319(7219): 1249 - 1252.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, C. Karadi, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel
Display Modes for CT Colonography: Part II. Blinded Comparison of Axial CT and Virtual Endoscopic and Panoramic Endoscopic Volume-rendered Studies
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 203 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
C D JOHNSON and D A AHLQUIST
Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening
Gut, March 1, 1999; 44(3): 301 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. M. Fenlon, D. B. McAneny, D. P. Nunes, P. D. Clarke, and J. T. Ferrucci
Occlusive Colon Carcinoma: Virtual Colonoscopy in the Preoperative Evaluation of the Proximal Colon
Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 423 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
H M Fenlon, D P Nunes, P D Clarke, and J T Ferrucci
Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study
Gut, December 1, 1998; 43(6): 806 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Yoshida, Y. Masutani, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman
Computerized Detection of Colonic Polyps at CT Colonography on the Basis of Volumetric Features: Pilot Study
Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 327 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.