AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugahara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugahara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1401-1410, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain

T Sugahara, Y Korogi, T Hirai, S Hamatake, I Ikushima, Y Shigematu and M Takahashi
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neuroradiologic application of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) and segmented-HASTE (s-HASTE) sequences in comparison with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, HASTE, s-HASTE, and fast spin-echo sequences were evaluated for blurring artifacts with a stationary phantom and for motion artifacts with a moving phantom, which repeated constant or intermittent to-and-fro motions at variable intervals. Second, 30 consecutive patients with various intracranial diseases were prospectively examined with the three sequences. Lesions were classified into four groups according to size and signal intensity on fast spin-echo MR images as follows: large hyperintense, small hyperintense, small markedly hyperintense, and hypointense lesions. Signal intensities of the lesion, putamen, and gray matter were compared with the signal intensity of white matter, and contrast-to- noise ratios were calculated. Overall image quality, conspicuity of lesions, delineation of the junction between gray matter and white matter, conspicuity of the putamen, and certain types of artifacts were evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: In the phantom study, the HASTE sequence was least affected by motion artifacts and the fast spin-echo sequence was most affected although the images of the HASTE sequence were most degraded by blurring artifacts. In the clinical study, we found no significant differences among the three sequences for contrast- to-noise ratios or conspicuity of large hyperintense and small markedly hyperintense lesions. However, the contrast-to-noise ratios of hypointense lesions and gray matter, and the conspicuity of hypointense lesions were significantly poorer for the HASTE sequence than for the fast spin-echo sequence. The contrast-to-noise ratios of small hyperintense lesions and the putamen, conspicuity of small hyperintense lesions and putamen, and delineation of the junction between gray matter and white matter were significantly poorer for HASTE and s-HASTE sequences than for the fast spin-echo sequence. Ghost artifacts, which were observed during the s-HASTE sequence, were sometimes superimposed on the image. CONCLUSION: The HASTE and s-HASTE sequences afford substantial time reduction and also decrease motion artifacts and thus have potential advantages for neuroradiologic application, especially in uncooperative or unsedated children. The s-HASTE sequence may be preferable to the HASTE sequence because of fewer blurring artifacts and higher T2 contrast. However, small hyperintense and hypointense lesions may be overlooked when HASTE and s-HASTE sequences are used.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. P. Forbes, J. G. Pipe, J. P. Karis, V. Farthing, and J. E. Heiserman
Brain Imaging in the Unsedated Pediatric Patient: Comparison of Periodically Rotated Overlapping Parallel Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction and Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequences
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 794 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. K. Penzkofer, T. Pfluger, Y. Pochmann, O. Meissner, and G. Leinsinger
MR Imaging of the Brain in Pediatric Patients: Diagnostic Value of HASTE Sequences
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 509 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Filippi, M. A. Rocca, M. Wiessmann, S. Mennea, M. Cercignani, T. A. Yousry, M. P. Sormani, and G. Comi
A Comparison of MR Imaging with Fast-FLAIR, HASTE-FLAIR, and EPI-FLAIR Sequences in the Assessment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 1999; 20(10): 1931 - 1938.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Liang, Y. Korogi, T. Sugahara, Y. Shigematsu, T. Okuda, I. Ikushima, and M. Takahashi
Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage with Susceptibility-Weighted MR Sequences
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1527 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Sugahara, Y. Korogi, Y. Ge, Y. Shigematsu, L. Liang, K. Yoshizumi, M. Kitajima, and M. Takahashi
Contrast Enhancement of Intracranial Lesions: Conventional T1-Weighted Spin-Echo versus Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging Techniques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1554 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.