AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Disler, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Disler, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1439-1447, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water

DG Disler, TR McCauley, LM Ratner, CD Kesack and JA Cooper
Department of Radiology, Albany Medical College, NY 12208, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if gradient-echo MR imaging with TEs selected with fat and water in phase and out of phase can help predict the likelihood of neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions in bone marrow. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with 31 suspected bone marrow lesions underwent MR imaging, including two spoiled gradient-echo sequences identical in all parameters except TE, which was chosen such that fat and water were either in phase or out of phase. Relative ratios of the abnormal bone marrow signal intensity and a control site on the in-phase and out-of- phase images were expressed. The images were also assessed independently by two reviewers who were unaware of the patients' identities and clinical histories. Reviewers assessed decreased marrow signal intensity relative to control sites on the out-of-phase and in- phase images. Pathologic confirmation was obtained in 16 patients (17 lesions); the remainder of patients had either established diagnoses or determination of benignity based on stability of findings at 1 year. Relative ratios were compared with the Student's t test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the reviewers' scores were evaluated with ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The relative signal-intensity ratios were 1.03 +/- 0.13 for the neoplastic group and 0.62 +/- 0.13 for the nonneoplastic group (p < .0001). ROC curve analysis of the signal-intensity ratios showed a z-score of .99. A ratio cutoff value of 0.81 resulted in a 95% sensitivity and a 95% specificity for detection of neoplasm. Both reviewers achieved 100% sensitivity and 94-100% specificity for detection of neoplasms. CONCLUSION: In-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging of bone marrow signal-intensity abnormalities can help predict the likelihood of neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. M. Gerdes, R. Kijowski, and S. B. Reeder
IDEAL Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System: Robust Water Fat Separation for Uniform Fat Suppression, Marrow Evaluation, and Cartilage Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): W284 - W291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W.K. Erly, E.S. Oh, and E.K. Outwater
The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1183 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Zajick Jr, W. B. Morrison, M. E. Schweitzer, J. A. Parellada, and J. A. Carrino
Benign and Malignant Processes: Normal Values and Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging in Vertebral Marrow
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. M. Fayad, S. Kawamoto, I. R. Kamel, D. A. Bluemke, J. Eng, F. J. Frassica, and E. K. Fishman
Distinction of Long Bone Stress Fractures from Pathologic Fractures on Cross-Sectional Imaging: How Successful Are We?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Stäbler, A. B. Doma, A. Baur, A. Krüger, and M. F. Reiser
Reactive Bone Marrow Changes in Infectious Spondylitis: Quantitative Assessment with MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 863 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. L. Andrews
Evaluation of the Marrow Space in the Adult Hip
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 27S - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. M. Delfaut, J. Beltran, G. Johnson, J. Rousseau, X. Marchandise, and A. Cotten
Fat Suppression in MR Imaging: Techniques and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.