AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keogan, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keogan, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1493-1499, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Contrast-enhanced CT of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: delay time for optimal imaging

MT Keogan, JT Seabourn, EK Paulson, VG McDermott, DM Delong and RC Nelson
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal time for obtaining delayed images with contrast-enhanced CT in patients who have intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CT studies were performed in 25 consecutive patients with proven cholangiocarcinoma, including six patients who had undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Dynamic images of the liver were obtained after 150 ml of IV contrast material was administered at 3 ml/sec. Delayed CT images were then obtained at 10, 20, and 30 min. Tumor-liver attenuation difference was determined quantitatively for each time period. Images were qualitatively evaluated by three observers for attenuation of the tumor (hypoattenuating, isoattenuating, or hyperattenuating) relative to the liver. Observer confidence for tumor detection was graded on a four-point scale. Dynamic and delayed images were compared for tumor conspicuity. RESULTS: On dynamic images, 18 tumors (72%) were hypoattenuating, six (24%) were isoattenuating, and one was heterogeneous. On delayed images, 15 (60%) of these 25 tumors were isoattenuating and nine (36%) were hyperattenuating compared with the liver. Tumor-liver attenuation difference was greatest on dynamic studies (p < .01) and did not differ significantly among the three delay times (p > .20). All tumors seen on delayed images were also seen on dynamic images; however, in three patients (12%), the confidence level for presence of tumor was better on delayed than on dynamic images. Confidence levels for presence of tumor did not vary significantly among the three delay times. Attenuation values on dynamic and delayed images did not differ for the groups of patients who had or had not undergone prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy (p > .05). CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of hilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, delayed CT images are helpful for tumor characterization and may improve observer confidence for the presence of tumor. The optimal time for acquisition of delayed images is 10-20 min after contrast media injection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. Y. Jeong, Y. J. Kim, K. H. Lee, S. H. Choi, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
CT Differentiation of cholangiocarcinoma from periductal fibrosis in patients with hepatolithiasis.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 445 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.