AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 397-402, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions

T Ichikawa, H Haradome, J Hachiya, T Nitatori and T Araki
Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echoplanar imaging in characterizing focal hepatic lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging on a 1.5-T MR unit was performed in 46 patients with 74 known focal hepatic lesions (11 hemangiomas, 15 metastases, and 48 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs]). Mean values for ADCs and CNRs of all lesions were calculated. Mean values for CNRs with diffusion-weighted imaging were also compared with those for breath- hold T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. RESULTS: The mean values for ADCs were different for each type of tumor (5.39 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in hemangiomas, 2.85 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.59 in metastases, and 3.84 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.92 in HCCs), and each of them was significantly greater than the mean values for ADCs of the normal liver (2.28 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in normal liver [p < .05] except metastasis versus normal liver [p < .1]). Also, the mean values for ADCs were based on differences of ADC values. Only four (6%) of 63 malignant tumors (three HCCs and one metastasis) could not be differentiated from hemangiomas. The mean value for CNRs with diffusion- weighted images (14.4 +/- 8.54 in HCC and 29.0 +/- 6.79 in metastasis) was significantly higher than the mean values for CNRs obtained with T2- weighted fast spin-echo images in both metastases and HCCs (p < .05), whereas no significant difference was seen for hemangiomas. CONCLUSION: Mean values for ADCs differed for the three types of the hepatic lesions and were higher than ADCs of the normal liver. We suggest that diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful for increased detection of HCCs and metastases and in distinguishing these entities from hemangiomas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, Y. Mazaheri Tehrani, L. Wang, N. M. Ishill, L. H. Schwartz, and H. Hricak
Renal Masses: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging--A Preliminary Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 458 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. G. Lall, A. M. Aisen, N. Bansal, and K. Sandrasegaran
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 993 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Parikh, S. J. Drew, V. S. Lee, S. Wong, E. M. Hecht, J. S. Babb, and B. Taouli
Focal Liver Lesion Detection and Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Comparison with Standard Breath-hold T2-weighted Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 812 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Asayama, K. Yoshimitsu, Y. Nishihara, H. Irie, S. Aishima, A. Taketomi, and H. Honda
Arterial Blood Supply of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Histologic Grading: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W28 - W34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Taouli, A. J. Tolia, M. Losada, J. S. Babb, E. S. Chan, M. A. Bannan, and H. Tobias
Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Quantification of Liver Fibrosis: Preliminary Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 799 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Coenegrachts, J Delanote, L Ter Beek, M Haspeslagh, S Bipat, J Stoker, F Van Kerkhove, L Steyaert, H Rigauts, and J W Casselman
Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 524 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Yoshikawa, H. Kawamitsu, D. G. Mitchell, Y. Ohno, Y. Ku, Y. Seo, M. Fujii, and K. Sugimura
ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1521 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Nasu, Y. Kuroki, S. Nawano, S. Kuroki, T. Tsukamoto, S. Yamamoto, K. Motoori, and T. Ueda
Hepatic Metastases: Diffusion-weighted Sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 122 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Taouli, A. J. Martin, A. Qayyum, R. B. Merriman, D. Vigneron, B. M. Yeh, and F. V. Coakley
Parallel Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Liver: Preliminary Experience in Healthy Volunteers
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 677 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Maeda, H. Sakuma, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda
Quantitative Assessment of Diffusion Abnormalities in Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures by Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1203 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Taouli, V. Vilgrain, E. Dumont, J.-L. Daire, B. Fan, and Y. Menu
Evaluation of Liver Diffusion Isotropy and Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions with Two Single-Shot Echo-planar MR Imaging Sequences: Prospective Study in 66 Patients
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Murtz, S. Flacke, F. Traber, J. S. van den Brink, J. Gieseke, and H. H. Schild
Abdomen: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with Pulse-triggered Single-Shot Sequences
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. T. Keogan and R. R. Edelman
Technologic Advances in Abdominal MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 310 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Yamada, W. Aung, Y. Himeno, T. Nakagawa, and H. Shibuya
Diffusion Coefficients in Abdominal Organs and Hepatic Lesions: Evaluation with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Echo-planar MR Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 617 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.