American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 593-597, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging

F Eckstein, J Westhoff, H Sittek, KP Maag, M Haubner, S Faber, KH Englmeier and M Reiser
Institut fur Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munchen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest that MR imaging is capable of providing accurate data on knee joint cartilage volume and thickness in vitro, but the reproducibility of these data in living subjects has not been analyzed rigorously. Our aim was therefore to determine the in vivo reproducibility of volume and thickness measurements from replicated data sets, applying three-dimensional (3D) postprocessing methods. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were imaged six times at a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm with a fat-suppressed fast low-angle shot 3D sequence, the knee being repositioned in between replicated examinations. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the articular cartilage surfaces were obtained from sagittal data sets, and the cartilage volumes were calculated. The thickness distribution was analyzed throughout the joint surfaces independent of the section orientation, using a previously validated 3D minimal-distance algorithm. RESULTS: In the volunteers, the coefficient of variation for replicated volume measurements ranged from 1.3% (patella) to 3.4% (lateral tibia), and the standard deviation of the individual cartilage volumes ranged from +/- 16% (lateral tibia) to +/- 22% (femur). The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from .959 (lateral tibia) to .995 (patella). The interobserver evaluation was similar to the interscan reproducibility. The mean interscan deviation of the maximal cartilage thickness interval ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 cartilage thickness intervals (of 0.5 mm); only in rare cases did we record deviations greater than one thickness interval. CONCLUSION: MR imaging can be used to determine cartilage volume and thickness in the knee joints of living subjects with high precision, provided that a fat-suppressed gradient-echo sequence with adequate resolution and 3D digital image processing are used.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. E. Anderson, B. J. Ellis, C. L. Peters, and J. A. Weiss Cartilage Thickness: Factors Influencing Multidetector CT Measurements in a Phantom Study Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 133 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Siepmann, J. McGovern, J. H. Brittain, and S. B. Reeder High-Resolution 3D Cartilage Imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1510 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Gold, S. B. Reeder, H. Yu, P. Kornaat, A. S. Shimakawa, J. W. Johnson, N. J. Pelc, C. F. Beaulieu, and J. H. Brittain Articular Cartilage of the Knee: Rapid Three-dimensional MR Imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL Balanced Steady-State Free Precession--Initial Experience Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 546 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Kessler, C. Glaser, S. Tittel, M. Reiser, and A. B. Imhoff Volume Changes in the Menisci and Articular Cartilage of Runners: An In Vivo Investigation Based on 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 832 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Gold, B. A. Hargreaves, S. S. Vasanawala, J. D. Webb, A. S. Shimakawa, J. H. Brittain, and C. F. Beaulieu Articular Cartilage of the Knee: Evaluation with Fluctuating Equilibrium MR Imaging--Initial Experience in Healthy Volunteers Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 712 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Y. El-Khoury, K. J. Alliman, H. J. Lundberg, M. J. Rudert, T. D. Brown, and C. L. Saltzman Cartilage Thickness in Cadaveric Ankles: Measurement with Double-Contrast Multi-Detector Row CT Arthrography versus MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A E Wluka, R Wolfe, S Stuckey, and F M Cicuttini How does tibial cartilage volume relate to symptoms in subjects with knee osteoarthritis? Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2004; 63(3): 264 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Jackson, A. J. Teichtahl, M. E. Morris, A. E. Wluka, S. R. Davis, and F. M. Cicuttini The effect of the knee adduction moment on tibial cartilage volume and bone size in healthy women Rheumatology, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 311 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Teichtahl, A Wluka, and F M Cicuttini Abnormal biomechanics: a precursor or result of knee osteoarthritis? Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2003; 37(4): 289 - 290. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F M Cicuttini, A E Wluka, and S L Stuckey Tibial and femoral cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2001; 60(10): 977 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Muhlbauer, S. Lukasz, S. Faber, T. Stammberger, and F. Eckstein Comparison of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness in Triathletes and Physically Inactive Volunteers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-Dimensional Analysis Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2000; 28(4): 541 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]