American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 859-861, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Trends in the use of radiology with inpatients: what has changed in a decade?

R Khorasani, PK Goel, NM Ma'luf, LA Fox, SE Seltzer and DW Bates
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate trends in the use of radiology with inpatients in the 10-year period of 1984-1993. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed administrative data from a 751-bed, tertiary care hospital between October 1, 1983, and September 30, 1993 (Fiscal years 1984-1993). We coded each study by imaging technique: CT, MR imaging, sonography, nuclear medicine, or conventional studies (plain films and fluoroscopy). Echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and angioplasty procedures were omitted. The number of admissions per year was adjusted for severity of disease (case-mix- adjusted admission [CMA]). We used relative value units to evaluate workload changes during the study period. We assessed significance of trends using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The total number of imaging studies per CMA decreased during the study period (p = .0001). This was due to a decrease in the number of conventional studies (p = .0001) and sonograms per CMA (p = .02), despite significant increases in the numbers of CT (p = .005) and MR imaging (p = .0001) studies per CMA. No significant change existed in the number of nuclear medicine studies per CMA (p = .11). The global, professional, and technical relative value units per CMA rose during the latter half of the study. CONCLUSION: The overall number of imaging studies per CMA decreased during the decade, despite a significant rise in the use of CT and MR imaging, suggesting that these new imaging techniques are replacing older ones. To control further increases in overall imaging costs, priority should be placed on understanding the patterns of use for CT and MR imaging techniques and curbing their inappropriate use.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Detsky, D. R. McDonald, M. O. Baerlocher, G. A. Tomlinson, D. C. McCrory, and C. M. Booth Does this patient with headache have a migraine or need neuroimaging? JAMA, September 13, 2006; 296(10): 1274 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. C. Khasgiwala, M. D. Aronson, R. B. Davis, and M. P. Rosen Imaging utilization in the era of the hospitalist. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 2 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Beinfeld and G. S. Gazelle Diagnostic Imaging Costs: Are They Driving Up the Costs of Hospital Care? Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 934 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Ravenel, E. M. Scalzetti, W. Huda, and W. Garrisi Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in Chest CT Examinations Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Henley, F. A. Mann, S. Holt, and J. Marotta Trends in Case-Mix-Adjusted Use of Radiology Resources at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 851 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. I. Reiner, E. L. Siegel, C. Flagle, F. J. Hooper, R. E. Cox, and M. Scanlon Effect of Filmless Imaging on the Utilization of Radiologic Services Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 163 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text]