American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 907-912, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography

TF Hany, M Schmidt, CP Davis, SC Gohde and JF Debatin
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the added diagnostic value of various three-dimensional (3D) data viewing techniques when analyzing contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (mean age, 62 years) with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease were assessed with breath-hold, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and catheter angiography, which served as the standard of reference. After an initial interpretation of the 3D MR angiographic data sets based only on standardized maximum intensity projections (MIP), the diagnostic gain of the stepwise addition of interactive multiplanar reformations, shaded-surface displays (SSD), and virtual intraarterial endoscopy (VIE) images was calculated. Time required for each step of postprocessing was measured. RESULTS: Pathologic changes were revealed by catheter angiography in 60 vascular segments (50 severe stenoses, seven aneurysms, and three occlusions). The average postprocessing times were MIP, 8 min (range, 5- 12 min); multiplanar reformations, 9 min (range, 3-11 min); SSD, 15 min (range, 8-25 min); and VIE, 40 min (range, 18-63 min). Addition of multiplanar reformations to MIPs resulted in the greatest gain of diagnostic accuracy, from 92% to 96%, and diagnostic confidence. When analysis was based on all four techniques, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed only minimal improvements in diagnostic confidence, whereas diagnostic accuracy remained unchanged at 96%. CONCLUSION: Accurate and time-effective analysis of contrast- enhanced 3D MR angiography should be based on MIP algorithms and multiplanar reformations. Additional evaluation with VIE or SSD techniques is time-consuming and provides little diagnostic gain.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Ota, K. Takase, H. Rikimaru, M. Tsuboi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, S. Higano, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1141 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Leiner, A. G. H. Kessels, P. J. Nelemans, G. B. C. Vasbinder, M. W. de Haan, P. E. J. H. M. Kitslaar, K. Y. J. A. M. Ho, J. H. M. Tordoir, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven Peripheral Arterial Disease: Comparison of Color Duplex US and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography for Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Kunz, K. Oberholzer, W. Kuroczynski, G. Horstick, F. Krummenauer, M. Thelen, and K.-F. Kreitner Assessment of Chronic Aortic Dissection: Contribution of Different ECG-Gated Breath-Hold MRI Techniques Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1319 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, and A. Duerinckx Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1867 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. A. van Ooijen, K. Y. Ho, J. Dorgelo, and M. Oudkerk Coronary Artery Imaging with Multidetector CT: Visualization Issues RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): e16 - e16. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. K. Willmann, S. Wildermuth, T. Pfammatter, J. E. Roos, B. Seifert, P. R. Hilfiker, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 798 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hernandez-Hoyos, M. Orkisz, P. Puech, C. Mansard-Desbleds, P. Douek, and I. E. Magnin Computer-assisted Analysis of Three-dimensional MR Angiograms RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 421 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Moshage, S. Achenbach, and W. G. Daniel Novel approaches to the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary-artery disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 21 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nelemans, T. Leiner, H. C. W. de Vet, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven Peripheral Arterial Disease: Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of MR Angiography Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 105 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Visser and M. G. Myriam Hunink Peripheral Arterial Disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography versus Color-guided Duplex US-A Meta-analysis Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 67 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Mallouhi, M. Schocke, W. Judmaier, C. Wolf, A. Dessl, B. V. Czermak, P. Waldenberger, and W. R. Jaschke 3D MR Angiography of Renal Arteries: Comparison of Volume Rendering and Maximum Intensity Projection Algorithms Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]