AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wise, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wise, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 919-923, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity

SW Wise, KD Hopper, T Ten Have and T Schwartz
Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses artifactual luminal distortion, or eccentricity, that affects measurement of stenosis on CT angiography performed with a variety of helical protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-vessel carotid artery phantom was built with five known grades of stenoses (25%, 50%, 75%, 88%, and 94%) and three lengths of stenosis (1, 3, and 5 mm). This phantom was scanned with conventional and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch helical CT with slice thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm, and three vessel orientations: parallel, 45 degrees oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis. Oblique multiplanar reconstruction was performed with the latter two vessel orientations to produce images similar to the parallel to z-axis orientation. The cross-sectional images were then used to measure the maximum and minimum (longest and shortest) luminal diameters in and out of each stenosis at a computer workstation by a single investigator who was unaware of the scanning technique. Percentage of stenosis was assessed by three methods: cross- sectional area in and out of the stenosis, maximum diameter out of stenosis and minimum in stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method), and minimum diameter in and out of the stenosis. Comparisons were made with the gold standard using the equation (measured percentage of stenosis-actual percentage of stenosis) based on known luminal diameters of the phantom. Luminal eccentricity was assessed for each of the vessels and scanning parameters as a ratio of minimum to maximum diameters. RESULTS: All three methods of measuring stenoses were strongly affected by luminal eccentricity. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method overestimated percentage of stenosis an average of 1.64%. The most accurate results were obtained when using the minimum diameter in and out of the stenoses (-0.45% from the gold standard). Eccentricity was significantly greater in stenoses than in normal lumen (p < .0001) and when the vessels were oriented perpendicular to the z- axis (p = .0003). A progressive increase in eccentricity was seen in the 4- and 8-mm slice thicknesses and the 3- and 5-mm-long stenoses (p < .001; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Artifactual luminal eccentricity has significant implications for measuring percentage of stenosis revealed by CT angiography. Eccentricity increases in longer stenoses, thicker slices, and vessels oriented perpendicular to the z-axis. With CT angiography, measurement of minimum diameters in and out of a stenosis provides the most accurate assessment of percentage of stenosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. Villablanca, F. J. Rodriguez, T. Stockman, S. Dahliwal, M. Omura, S. Hazany, and J. Sayre
MDCT Angiography for Detection and Quantification of Small Intracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Catheter Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga
Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y.-H. Kim, E. M. Marom, J. E. Herndon II, and H. P. McAdams
Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi
Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. S. Smith, H. C. Roberts, N. A. Chuang, K. C. Ong, T. J. Lee, S. C. Johnston, and W. P. Dillon
Safety and Feasibility of a CT Protocol for Acute Stroke: Combined CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion Imaging in 53 Consecutive Patients
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2003; 24(4): 688 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Funabashi, Y. Kobayashi, M. Perlroth, and G. D. Rubin
Coronary Artery: Quantitative Evaluation of Normal Diameter Determined with Electron-Beam CT Compared with Cine Coronary Angiography--Initial Experience
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 263 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. D. Cody
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Image Processing in CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1255 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Hernandez-Hoyos, M. Orkisz, P. Puech, C. Mansard-Desbleds, P. Douek, and I. E. Magnin
Computer-assisted Analysis of Three-dimensional MR Angiograms
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 421 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger
CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis
CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.