AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzenberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzenberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1181-1185, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Restenosis of peripheral stents and stent grafts as revealed by intravascular sonography: in vivo comparison with angiography

H Schwarzenberg, S Muller-Hulsbeck, CC Gluer, F Wesner and M Heller
Department of Radiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat zu Kiel, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare intravascular sonography with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of luminal dimension and morphologic features of endovascular stents and stent grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven pelvic and 24 femoral stents (12 Wall-stents; 27 covered and 22 uncovered nitinol stents) in 50 patients were evaluated 15 +/- 10 months after implantation by DSA and intravascular sonography. The degree of maximum instent restenosis as revealed by DSA and intravascular sonography was compared for each location. Morphologic features of the stents and stenoses were also assessed. RESULTS: Intravascular sonography and DSA correlated well (R2 = .96) in determining in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was underestimated by 13% +/- 6% by DSA compared with intravascular sonography. Differences in determining in-stent restenosis with intravascular sonography and DSA were not associated with severity of stenosis or type of stent. Intravascular sonography revealed incomplete expansion of stents in 21 cases, whereas DSA revealed incomplete expansion of stents in seven cases. The intra- and interobserver variabilities in our study were 4% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In- stent restenoses are underestimated with DSA. Intravascular sonography is superior to DSA for detection of incomplete stent expansion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.