American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1239-1241, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae

BA Bottger, ME Schweitzer, KI El-Noueam and M Desai
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define the MR imaging criteria for normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty ankles in 25 asymptomatic volunteers and 30 ankles in patients with Achilles tendon disorders underwent MR imaging. Increased signal intensity consistent with fluid or synovium outlining the retrocalcaneal bursa was measured. RESULTS: Of 80 bursae, 77 (96%) had measurable fluid or synovial signal intensity revealed by MR imaging. Asymptomatic volunteers had average bursal dimensions of 1 mm in the anteroposterior dimension, 6 mm in the transverse dimension, and 3 mm in the craniocaudal dimension. Bursal dimensions greater than 1 mm, 11 mm, or 7 mm, respectively, were not seen in asymptomatic subjects but were seen in 16 (53%) of 30 ankles of patients with Achilles tendon disorders. CONCLUSION: On MR imaging, the asymptomatic retrocalcaneal bursa normally contains detectable high-signal-intensity fluid or synovium or both. A bursa larger than 1 mm anteroposteriorly, 11 mm transversely, or 7 mm craniocaudally is abnormal.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Floemer, W. B. Morrison, G. Bongartz, and H. P. Ledermann MRI Characteristics of Olecranon Bursitis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 29 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Q. Ly and L. T. Bui-Mansfield Anatomy of and Abnormalities Associated with Kager's Fat Pad Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 147 - 154. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K M Khan, B B Forster, J Robinson, Y Cheong, L Louis, L Maclean, and J E Taunton Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2003; 37(2): 149 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Schweitzer and D. Karasick MR Imaging of Disorders of the Achilles Tendon Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 613 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Karjalainen, K. Soila, H. J. Aronen, H. K. Pihlajamaki, O. Tynninen, T. Paavonen, and P. F. J. Tirman MR Imaging of Overuse Injuries of the Achilles Tendon Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 251 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Narvaez, J. Narvaez, R. Ortega, C. Aguilera, A. Sanchez, and E. Andia Painful Heel: MR Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 333 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]