American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1261-1267, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system

MM McNicholas, VD Raptopoulos, RK Schwartz, RG Sheiman, A Zormpala, PK Prassopoulos, RD Ernst and JD Pearlman
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was threefold: to evaluate the ability of excretory phase CT urography to opacify the urinary collecting system by comparing opacification seen on CT with the opacification seen on a series of unmatched IV urography examinations; to determine the optimal CT urography technique for ureteral filling by comparing studies of patients who were imaged supine, prone, and with abdominal compression; and to assess the possible value that reformatted planar images might add to axial excretory phase images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with hematuria were imaged in one of four ways. Twenty-five patients underwent contrast-enhanced excretory phase helical CT of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. All patients were imaged in a supine position. Ten other patients underwent a similar CT protocol in which we used abdominal compression. Ten further patients underwent excretory phase CT while in a prone position. A final 25 patients underwent IV urography. Each patient's collecting system was arbitrarily divided into 10 parts (both right and left sides of calices; pelvis; upper, mid, and lower ureters) for scoring of images on a five-point scale for opacification by contrast material. Opacification scores for the four groups of patients were then compared. For patients who underwent CT, reformatted images of the collecting systems were generated and evaluated for their potential to add value to the conventional axial images. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the ability of CT urography and IV urography to yield opacification of the calices, pelvis, and upper or mid ureters. Opacification of the distal ureter was less well seen on supine CT urography than on IV urography. Prone and compression CT urography resulted in better opacification of the collecting system than the supine noncompression technique. Opacification of the distal ureter was best seen with compression CT and was as good as that seen with IV urography. Reformatted CT urography was judged to be of probable or definite additional value to the axial images in 44% of cases. In each case, we saw a pathologic finding whose relationship to the kidney and collecting system was not as easy to appreciate on the axial CT scans. CONCLUSION: CT urography with abdominal compression results in reliable opacification of the collecting system that is comparable with opacification seen on IV urography. In patients with abnormalities, reformatted images were a useful adjunct to axial images. CT urography has potential as an imaging tool for the urothelium.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kawamoto, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Transitional Cell Neoplasm of the Upper Urinary Tract: Evaluation with MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 416 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kim, L. L. Wang, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae Opacification of Urinary Bladder and Ureter at CT Urography: Effect of a Log-rolling Procedure and Postvoiding Residual Bladder Urine Volume Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Takahashi, R. P. Hartman, T. J. Vrtiska, A. Kawashima, A. N. Primak, O. P. Dzyubak, J. N. Mandrekar, J. G. Fletcher, and C. H. McCollough Dual-Energy CT Iodine-Subtraction Virtual Unenhanced Technique to Detect Urinary Stones in an Iodine-Filled Collecting System: A Phantom Study Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1169 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Chow, S. W. Kwan, E. W. Olcott, and G. Sommer Split-Bolus MDCT Urography with Synchronous Nephrographic and Excretory Phase Enhancement Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 314 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Sudakoff, D. P. Dunn, R. S. Hellman, M. A. Laguna, C. R. Wilson, R. W. Prost, D. C. Eastwood, and H. J. Lim Opacification of the Genitourinary Collecting System During MDCT Urography with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Nonsaline Versus Saline Bolus Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kawamoto, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Opacification of the Collecting System and Ureters on Excretory-Phase CT Using Oral Water as Contrast Medium Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 136 - 140. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Caoili, P. Inampudi, R. H. Cohan, and J. H. Ellis Optimization of Multi-Detector Row CT Urography: Effect of Compression, Saline Administration, and Prolongation of Acquisition Delay Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Noroozian, R H Cohan, E M Caoili, N C Cowan, and J H Ellis Multislice CT urography: state of the art Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S74 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Dahl, P. R. Mueller, and R. H. Young Case 34-2004 - A 45-Year-Old Man with Recurrent Pain in the Right Flank and Hematuria N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 2004; 351(20): 2102 - 2110. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kawashima, T. J. Vrtiska, A. J. LeRoy, R. P. Hartman, C. H. McCollough, and B. F. King Jr CT Urography RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S35 - S54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, A. R. Schleipman, and S. G. Silverman Patient Radiation Dose at CT Urography and Conventional Urography Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 126 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. McTavish, M. Jinzaki, K. H. Zou, R. D. Nawfel, and S. G. Silverman Multi-Detector Row CT Urography: Comparison of Strategies for Depicting the Normal Urinary Collecting System Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Chow and F. G. Sommer Multidetector CT Urography with Abdominal Compression and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2001; 177(4): 849 - 855. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Zagoria Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Amis Jr Epitaph for the Urogram Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 639 - 640. [Full Text]

				S. E. Thompson, V. Raptopoulos, R. L. Sheiman, M. M. J. McNicholas, and P. Prassopoulos Abdominal Helical CT: Milk as a Low-Attenuation Oral Contrast Agent Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, T. J. Vrtiska, B. F. King, A. J. LeRoy, J. P. Quam, and R. R. Hattery Image Quality and Dose Comparison among Screen-Film, Computed, and CT Scanned Projection Radiography: Applications to CT Urography Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 395 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, G. J. Faerber, J. E. Montie, and J. H. Ellis Urinary Tract Abnormalities: Initial Experience with Multi-Detector Row CT Urography Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]