AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legmann, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legmann, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1315-1322, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography

P Legmann, O Vignaux, B Dousset, AJ Baraza, L Palazzo, I Dumontier, J Coste, A Louvel, G Roseau, D Couturier and A Bonnin
Department of Radiology, Universite Rene Descartes, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare dual-phase helical CT and endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with suspected pancreatic tumors underwent endosonography and dual-phase helical CT. A pathologic diagnosis was obtained in all cases with surgery (n = 23) or biopsy (n = 7), resulting in 27 neoplasms. Dual-phase helical CT and endosonographic findings were correlated with surgical and pathologic findings to determine diagnosis and resectability of pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: Overall diagnostic sensitivity was 92% for dual-phase helical CT and 100% for endosonography (p = .45). Overall accuracy for staging of pancreatic tumors was 93% for both dual-phase helical CT and endosonography. Overall accuracy for predicting resectability was 90% for both dual-phase helical CT and endosonography. Accuracy of predicting unresectability was 100% for dual-phase helical CT and 86% for endosonography (p > .80). Differences were not considered statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography do not differ significantly for diagnosis and assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
H. Furukawa, K. Uesaka, and N. Boku
Treatment Decision Making in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Multidisciplinary Team Discussion With Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography
Arch Surg, March 1, 2008; 143(3): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. K. Maithel, K. Khalili, E. Dixon, M. Guindi, M. P. Callery, M. S. Cattral, B. R. Taylor, S. Gallinger, P. D. Greig, D. R. Grant, et al.
Impact of Regional Lymph Node Evaluation in Staging Patients With Periampullary Tumors
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 202 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Saftoiu, C. Popescu, S. Cazacu, D. Dumitrescu, C. V. Georgescu, M. Popescu, T. Ciurea, and F. Gorunescu
Power Doppler endoscopic ultrasonography for the differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and pseudotumoral chronic pancreatitis.
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 363 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. D. Christein, R. L. Smoot, and M. B. Farnell
Central pancreatectomy: a technique for the resection of pancreatic neck lesions.
Arch Surg, March 1, 2006; 141(3): 293 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
Pancreatic Section
Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas
Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_5): v1 - v16.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. DeWitt, B. Devereaux, M. Chriswell, K. McGreevy, T. Howard, T. F. Imperiale, D. Ciaccia, K. A. Lane, D. Maglinte, K. Kopecky, et al.
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic Cancer
Ann Intern Med, November 16, 2004; 141(10): 753 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P Manoharan and M B Sheridan
Neoplasms of the pancreas
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, G. M. Besser, and A. B. Grossman
The Diagnosis and Medical Management of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 458 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Gangi, J. G. Fletcher, M. A. Nathan, J. A. Christensen, W. S. Harmsen, B. S. Crownhart, and S. T. Chari
Time Interval Between Abnormalities Seen on CT and the Clinical Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Retrospective Review of CT Scans Obtained Before Diagnosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 897 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. L. Bronstein, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, H. Choi, C. David, R. A. DuBrow, L. D. Broemeling, K. R. Cleary, and C. Charnsangavej
Detection of Small Pancreatic Tumors with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 619 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. E. Rivadeneira, M. Pochapin, S. R. Grobmyer, M. D. Lieberman, P. J. Christos, I. Jacobson, and J. M. Daly
Comparison of Linear Array Endoscopic Ultrasound and Helical Computed Tomography for the Staging of Periampullary Malignancies
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 890 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Gouya, O. Vignaux, J. Augui, B. Dousset, L. Palazzo, A. Louvel, S. Chaussade, and P. Legmann
CT, Endoscopic Sonography, and a Combined Protocol for Preoperative Evaluation of Pancreatic Insulinomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 987 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. L. Fidler, J. G. Fletcher, C. C. Reading, J. C. Andrews, G. B. Thompson, C. S. Grant, and F. J. Service
Preoperative Detection of Pancreatic Insulinomas on Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, C. Charnsangavej, and D. B. Evans
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Pancreatic Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1311 - 1323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Schima, R. Fugger, E. Schober, C. Oettl, P. Wamser, F. Grabenwoger, J. M. Ryan, and G. Novacek
Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Helical Hydro-CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 717 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A Meining, H J Dittler, A Wolf, R Lorenz, V Schusdziarra, J-R Siewert, M Classen, H Hofler, and T Rosch
You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging
Gut, May 1, 2002; 50(5): 599 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Melville, A Eastwood, E Morris, and D Forman
Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers
Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2001; 10(1): 57 - 64.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. R. Brugge and J. V. Dam
Pancreatic and Biliary Endoscopy
N. Engl. J. Med., December 9, 1999; 341(24): 1808 - 1816.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. Suits, R. Frazee, and R. A. Erickson
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration for the Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses
Arch Surg, June 1, 1999; 134(6): 639 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.