AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valls, C.
Right arrow Articles by Figueras, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valls, C.
Right arrow Articles by Figueras, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1341-1347, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Helical CT versus CT arterial portography in the detection of hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma

C Valls, E Lopez, A Guma, M Gil, A Sanchez, E Andia, J Serra, V Moreno and J Figueras
Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Ciutat Sanitaria i Universitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.

OBJECTIVE: The study is a prospective comparison of helical CT with nonhelical CT arterial portography (CTAP) in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma, using surgical and histologic findings as the gold standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with colorectal carcinoma and suspected liver metastases were prospectively examined with helical CT and CTAP before surgery. In nine cases, surgery was not performed. In the remaining 26 patients, imaging results were correlated with surgical and pathologic findings. Three radiologists prospectively assessed metastatic involvement with both techniques. The results were compared with pathologic and surgical findings on a lesion-by-lesion basis. In a second phase, three radiologists not directly concerned in the design of the study independently assessed metastatic involvement of the liver as revealed on helical CT and CTAP on a segment-by-segment basis with a five-level scale of confidence. Results were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic methods. RESULTS: The results of the histologic study disclosed 50 metastatic lesions. Helical CT had a sensitivity of 76% (38/50) and a positive predictive value of 90%. CTAP had a sensitivity of 74% (37/50) and positive predictive value of 69%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a greater area under the curve (Az index), 0.96, for helical CT than for CTAP (0.86). Differences were statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Helical CT is superior to nonhelical CTAP in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. C. Wei, P. D. Greig, D. Grant, B. Taylor, B. Langer, and S. Gallinger
Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases: A 10-Year Experience
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2006; 13(5): 668 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Lejeune, M. J. Bismuth, T. Conroy, C. Zanni, P. Bey, L. Bedenne, J. Faivre, P. Arveux, and F. Guillemin
Use of a Decision Analysis Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the Management of Metachronous Liver Metastases of Colorectal Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2020 - 2028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ward, P. J. Robinson, J. A. Guthrie, S. Downing, D. Wilson, J. P. A. Lodge, K. R. Prasad, G. J. Toogood, and J. I. Wyatt
Liver Metastases in Candidates for Hepatic Resection: Comparison of Helical CT and Gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker
Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. V. Pandharipande, G. A. Krinsky, H. Rusinek, and V. S. Lee
Perfusion Imaging of the Liver: Current Challenges and Future Goals
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 661 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, M. T. Beinfeld, E. F. Halpern, and M. C. Weinstein
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: Cost-effectiveness of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation versus That of Hepatic Resection
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 729 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Soyer, M. Poccard, M. Boudiaf, M. Abitbol, L. Hamzi, Y. Panis, P. Valleur, and R. Rymer
Detection of Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases at Triple-Phase Helical CT: Sensitivity of Phases and Comparison with Surgical and Histopathologic Findings
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. R. Kamel, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, H. J. V. Braga, B. A. Birnbaum, E. K. Fishman, R. E. Thompson, and D. A. Bluemke
Surgically Staged Focal Liver Lesions: Accuracy and Reproducibility of Dual-Phase Helical CT for Detection and Characterization
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 752 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Haider, M. M. Amitai, D. C. Rappaport, M. E. O'Malley, A. E. Hanbidge, M. Redston, G. A. Lockwood, and S. Gallinger
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT in Preoperative Assessment of Small (<=1.5 cm) Liver Metastases: Is Thinner Collimation Better?
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 137 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Kinkel, Y. Lu, M. Both, R. S. Warren, and R. F. Thoeni
Detection of Hepatic Metastases from Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract by Using Noninvasive Imaging Methods (US, CT, MR Imaging, PET): A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 748 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. R. van Erkel, M. E. J. Pijl, A. A. van den Berg-Huysmans, M. N. J. M. Wasser, C. J. H. van de Velde, and J. L. Bloem
Hepatic Metastases in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Relationship between Size of Metastases, Standard of Reference, and Detection Rates
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 404 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. J. V. Braga, M. A. Choti, V. S. Lee, E. K. Paulson, E. S. Siegelman, and D. A. Bluemke
Liver Lesions: Manganese-enhanced MR and Dual-Phase Helical CT for Preoperative Detection and Characterization—Comparison with Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Valls, E. Andía, A. Sánchez, A. Gumà, J. Figueras, J. Torras, and T. Serrano
Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Preoperative Detection and Assessment of Resectability with Helical CT
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 55 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Jang, J. H. Lim, S. J. Lee, C. K. Park, H. S. Park, and Y. S. Do
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Are Combined CT during Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography in Addition to Triple-Phase Helical CT All Necessary for Preoperative Evaluation?
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros
CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.