AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Sanctis, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bramson, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Sanctis, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bramson, R. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1381-1383, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Effect of patient position on sonographically measured renal length in neonates, infants, and children

JT De Sanctis, SA Connolly and RT Bramson
Department of Pediatric Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Renal length as measured on sonography is fundamental in the evaluation of renal disease in children. Understanding the effect of patient position and imaging plane on measured renal length is important for the appropriate use of the standards for interpretation. The goal of this study was to determine how measurement of renal length on sonograms is affected by changes in patient position and imaging plane. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six neonates, infants, and children who were 2 days to 17 years old underwent sonography froin October 1995 through June 1996. The largest long-axis renal dimension in sagittal, coronal, and prone planes was obtained for each kidney. Data were analyzed separately for each kidney to determine the individual variation of renal length. RESULTS: The correlation between maximum renal length on coronal, sagittal, and prone sonograms was greater than .95 for both right and left kidneys. The coronal plane yielded the largest measured renal length and the prone view, the smallest. The median of the absolute value of the differences between individual renal lengths as measured on sonograms in the different imaging planes was 2-3 mm for both left and right kidneys (mean difference, left kidney = 3.34-3.62 mm; mean difference, right kidney = 3.22-3.68 mm). CONCLUSION: The coronal and sagittal views yield the longest measurements and prone views, the shortest. Therefore, initial measurements should be made in coronal or sagittal planes. Prone views should be reserved for situations in which the suspicion exists that the kidney was foreshortened on other views. Reference standards done in a particular plane should be applicable in most situations regardless of the patient position necessary to obtain optimum length.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. A. Safak, E. Simsek, and T. Bahcebasi
Sonographic Assessment of the Normal Limits and Percentile Curves of Liver, Spleen, and Kidney Dimensions in Healthy School-Aged Children
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1359 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.