AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Semelka, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Semelka, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1457-1463, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of the small bowel using the HASTE sequence

JK Lee, HB Marcos and RC Semelka
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7510, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the normal MR appearance of small bowel on half- Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequence and to determine the ability of HASTE to reveal small-bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HASTE images in 50 patients without small-bowel disease were reviewed retrospectively to determine the normal MR appearance of small bowel. All patients fasted for at least 6 hr. The images of 18 patients with proven small-bowel abnormalities that were obtained with the HASTE sequence were also reviewed retrospectively by one observer unaware of the findings. The ability to characterize small-bowel diseases using the HASTE sequence was assessed. RESULTS: In the 50 patients with normal small bowel, no fluid was seen in the jejunum and ileum loops in four (8%). Fluid was present in less than 25% of small- bowel loops in 20 patients (40%), 25-50% of small-bowel loops in 20 patients (40%), and 50-75% of small-bowel loops in six patients (12%). Equal amounts of fluid were present in the jejunum and ileum in 30 patients (60%). More fluid was seen in the jejunum than the ileum in 16 patients (32%) and the reverse was true in four patients (8%). The mean diameter of the jejunum was 2.1 cm (SD = 0.34 cm) and of the ileum, 1.9 cm (SD = 0.41 cm). The thickness of the small-bowel wall and valvulae conniventes averaged 2 mm. Findings of dilatation of the bowel lumen and increased thickness of the bowel wall and valvulae conniventes were identified in 18 patients with small-bowel abnormalities. CONCLUSION: The normal and abnormal small bowel can be assessed using the HASTE sequence.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Maccioni, A. Bruni, A. Viscido, M. C. Colaiacomo, A. Cocco, C. Montesani, R. Caprilli, and M. Marini
MR Imaging in Patients with Crohn Disease: Value of T2- versus T1-weighted Gadolinium-enhanced MR Sequences with Use of an Oral Superparamagnetic Contrast Agent
Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2381040244.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Arslan, O. Etlik, M. Kayan, M. Harman, Y. Tuncer, and O. Temizoz
Peroral CT Enterography with Lactulose Solution: Preliminary Observations
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1173 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Furukawa, T. Saotome, M. Yamasaki, K. Maeda, N. Nitta, M. Takahashi, T. Tsujikawa, Y. Fujiyama, K. Murata, and T. Sakamoto
Cross-sectional Imaging in Crohn Disease
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 689 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Martin, M. Yang, D. Thomasson, and C. Acheson
MR Colonography: Development of Optimized Method with ex Vivo and in Vivo Systems
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 597 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. M. Koh, Y. Miao, R. J. S. Chinn, Z. Amin, R. Zeegen, D. Westaby, and J. C. Healy
MR Imaging Evaluation of the Activity of Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1325 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Laghi, I. Carbone, C. Catalano, R. Iannaccone, P. Paolantonio, I. Baeli, S. Trenna, and R. Passariello
Polyethylene Glycol Solution as an Oral Contrast Agent for MR Imaging of the Small Bowel
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1333 - 1334.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. T. Keogan and R. R. Edelman
Technologic Advances in Abdominal MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 310 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. W. Umschaden, D. Szolar, J. Gasser, M. Umschaden, and H. Haselbach
Small-Bowel Disease: Comparison of MR Enteroclysis Images with Conventional Enteroclysis and Surgical Findings
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 717 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.