AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polak, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mungovan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polak, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mungovan, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 1609-1611, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction

JF Polak, D Anderson, K Hagspiel and J Mungovan
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We studied factors that affect satisfaction of patients who have undergone placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) by interventional radiologists and patients' willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This longitudinal prospective consecutive cohort study included 85 patients referred for PICC placement. A record was made of catheter type, time taken for placement, patient age, and possible complications. Follow-up was obtained by telephone interview to determine the effect of site of placement in the arm, residence time of catheter, additional complications, and interference with activities of daily living on patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement at the same site. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors statistically predictive of patient willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs. RESULTS: Patients having PICCs placed above the elbow were more often satisfied (55 of 61 respondents) with catheter location than patients having placements at the elbow (three of 17 respondents). Patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement was strongly related to catheter location (p < .0001) and interference with activities of daily living (p < .0001). Catheter type, residence time, time taken for the placement, age, and complications were not associated with patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement. CONCLUSION: PICC placement above the elbow is more acceptable to patients than placement at the elbow. PICC placement above the elbow and patients' perception of less interference by the PICC with activities of daily living are positively related to patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.