AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belair, M.
Right arrow Articles by Therasse, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belair, M.
Right arrow Articles by Therasse, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 119-124, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Aortic graft infection: the value of percutaneous drainage

M Belair, G Soulez, VL Oliva, J Laperriere, D Gianfelice, JF Blair, J Sarrazin and E Therasse
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Pavillon Notre Dame, Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare patients with aortic graft infection treated by primary percutaneous drainage with patients who initially underwent surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients treated for aortic graft infection was performed. Eleven patients were initially treated with percutaneous drainage and 12 were treated with surgery. The morbidity, mortality, and postprocedural reintervention rates and clinical outcome were analyzed for each group. RESULTS: The septic process resolved in nine (82%) of 11 patients treated with percutaneous drainage. Of these nine patients, four were treated with percutaneous drainage alone. Drainage was followed by removal of the infected prosthetic graft in the remaining five patients. In the surgical group, sepsis resolved in only four patients (33%) (p = .036). No periprocedural deaths occurred in the percutaneous drainage group, whereas six patients in the surgical group died in the perioperative period (p = .014). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage can be used as an initial form of treatment in the management of aortic graft infections. Surgery after percutaneous drainage appears to be safer than surgery alone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
D. F. Orton, R. F. LeVeen, J. A. Saigh, W. C. Culp, J. L. Fidler, T. J. Lynch, T. C. Goertzen, and T. C. McCowan
Aortic Prosthetic Graft Infections: Radiologic Manifestations and Implications for Management
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 977 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.