AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, R. M., Jr
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 371-374, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Significance of radiographic cardiomegaly in orthotopic heart transplant recipients

JD Murphy, PJ Mergo, HM Taylor, R Fields and RM Mills Jr
Department of Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of radiographic cardiomegaly in orthotopic heart transplant recipients and to identify causative anatomic and physiologic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measured using standard posteroanterior chest radiography with left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction measured on two- dimensional echocardiography; right ventricular systolic pressure; and systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure measured at biopsy in 46 heart transplant recipients. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (61%) of the 46 patients had radiographic cardiomegaly. When we compared heart transplant recipients who had a CTR greater than 0.5 with recipients who had a CTR less than or equal to 0.5, we found no significant difference between their respective left ventricular end-diastolic diameters, left ventricular ejection fractions, right ventricular systolic pressures, systolic blood pressures, or mean blood pressures. A statistically significant difference existed between the mean values of diastolic blood pressure for transplant recipients with and without radiographic cardiomegaly. We found no significant correlation between CTR and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or mean blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The statistically significant difference between the mean values of diastolic blood pressure of transplant recipients with and without radiographic cardiomegaly is clinically insignificant and unlikely to account for the finding of radiographic cardiomegaly. We conclude that radiographic cardiomegaly, which occurs frequently in heart transplant recipients, does not correlate with anatomic or physiologic parameters obtained under the same conditions. Radiographic cardiomegaly in heart transplant recipients does not connote allograft dysfunction or heart failure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.