AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 407-412, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of fistula in ano: are endoanal coils the gold standard?

S Halligan and CI Bartram
Intestinal Imaging Centre, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that fistula in ano is most accurately assessed using endoanal receiver coils because they provide superior spatial resolution. We aimed to determine their advantage by prospective comparison with conventional body coil imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive unselected patients with a diagnosis of anorectal sepsis were examined by MR imaging with an endoanal coil. Imaging with a body coil followed. Imaging was independently evaluated by two radiologists who classified fistulas according to the coil used and then compared their findings, which were validated surgically. RESULTS: Five patients could not tolerate coil insertion. In the remaining 25 patients, endoanal imaging revealed no abnormalities in three patients in whom the body coil image correctly showed Crohn's disease, a sinus, and a transsphincteric fistula. Imaging with both coils revealed sepsis in 16 patients, allowing radiologists to make correct primary track classification in 13 patients on endoanal imaging compared with 15 patients on body coil imaging. Endoanal imaging revealed 10 secondary extensions in eight patients, but further extensions in two of these patients and in a third patient were undetected. All these extensions were seen on body coil imaging. Overall, surgical concordance was 68% for endoanal imaging compared with 96% for conventional body coil imaging. CONCLUSION: Due to field- of-view limitations, endoanal imaging is less accurate than conventional body coil imaging for preoperative assessment of complex anal fistulas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Greenhalgh, C R. Cohen, D. Burling, and S. A. Taylor
Investigating perianal pain of uncertain cause
BMJ, February 16, 2008; 336(7640): 387 - 389.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Halligan and J. Stoker
Imaging of fistula in ano.
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 18 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. Engin
Endosonographic imaging of anorectal diseases.
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 57 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. N. Buchanan, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, A. B. Williams, D. Tarroni, and C. R. G. Cohen
Clinical Examination, Endosonography, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Fistula in Ano: Comparison with Outcome-based Reference Standard
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 674 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. N. Buchanan, S. Halligan, S. Taylor, A. Williams, R. Cohen, and C. Bartram
MRI of Fistula In Ano: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement and Effects of Directed Education
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 135 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Mallouhi, H. Bonatti, S. Peer, P. Lugger, F. Conrad, and G. Bodner
Detection and Characterization of Perianal Inflammatory Disease: Accuracy of Transperineal Combined Gray Scale and Color Doppler Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan, G. L. Beets, A. G. van der Hoop, A. G. H. Kessels, R. F. A. Vliegen, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven
Preoperative MR Imaging of Anal Fistulas: Does It Really Help the Surgeon?
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 75 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Malouf, A. B. Williams, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, S. Dhillon, and M. A. Kamm
Prospective Assessment of Accuracy of Endoanal MR Imaging and Endosonography in Patients with Fecal Incontinence
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 741 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Morris, J. A. Spencer, and N. S. Ambrose
MR Imaging Classification of Perianal Fistulas and Its Implications for Patient Management
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(3): 623 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.