AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutten, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jager, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutten, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jager, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 491-496, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Meniscal cysts: detection with high-resolution sonography

MJ Rutten, JM Collins, A van Kampen and GJ Jager
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of high-resolution sonography for the detection of meniscal cysts and associated meniscal tears and for the differentiation of meniscal cysts from other masses at the knee joint. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (51 knees) with a palpable mass at the knee joint were examined prospectively using a 7.5-MHz annular array transducer. Mass consistency and location and meniscal integrity were evaluated. Sonographic findings were correlated with surgery (46/51) and histopathology (15/51). Five patients did not undergo surgery. RESULTS: At surgery, 32 masses appeared to be meniscal cysts, whereas 19 were other types of masses. Sonographically, 31 of the 32 meniscal cysts were diagnosed correctly. Sonographic differentiation of the other types of masses from meniscal cysts could reliably be made in 17 of 19 cases; two masses were falsely interpreted as meniscal cysts. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of sonography in the depiction of meniscal cysts were 97%, 86%, and 94%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 94% and the negative predictive value was 92%. Meniscal tears (31/46) and meniscal tears concomitant with meniscal cysts (26/32) were detected with an accuracy of 83% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sonography is an accurate imaging technique for the detection of meniscal cysts and associated meniscal tears. Differentiation of meniscal cysts from other cystic and solid masses at the knee joint can be reliably made with sonography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
P J O'Connor and A J Grainger
Ultrasound imaging of joint disease
Imaging, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 188 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
I Beggs
Ultrasound of soft tissue masses
Imaging, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 202 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.