AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dake, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dake, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 553-558, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

1998 ARRS President's Award. The potential of in vivo vascular tissue engineering for the treatment of vascular thrombosis: a preliminary report. American Roentgen Ray Society

MD Kuo, JM Waugh, E Yuksel, AB Weinfeld, M Yuksel and MD Dake
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Hospital, CA 94305, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Current gene therapy and tissue engineering protocols suffer from a number of inherent limitations. In this study, we examine the feasibility of a new approach for the treatment of vascular thrombosis: in vivo tissue engineering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rabbit femoral veins were transfected in situ with either a previously characterized adenoviral-construct-expressing tissue plasminogen activator or a viral (adenoviral-construct-expressing beta-galactosidase) or nonviral (buffer) control and used as cross sections (n = 3). Treated veins were then harvested and grafted into the ipsilateral common femoral artery as an interposition vein graft. A potent stimulus for thrombus formation was then introduced into the recipient artery downstream of the graft. Six days later, the rabbits were sacrificed, and the grafts and downstream arteries were harvested. Vessel segments were then examined for thrombus according to defined anatomic zones. Transfection efficiency and presence of smooth muscle cells in the vein graft were also evaluated. RESULTS: The engineered vein graft showed a significant reduction in thrombus formation within both the graft and the downstream artery relative to nonviral (buffer) and viral (adenoviral- Rous sarcoma virus beta-galactosidase [Adv/RSV-betagal]) controls. Underlying endothelial cell transfection efficiency of 90% was observed in viral controls (Adv/RSV-betagal). A 2.4-fold increase in smooth muscle alpha-actin positive cells in the engineered vein graft was seen compared with nonviral (phosphate-buffered saline) controls. A 10-fold increase in smooth muscle alpha-actin-positive cells in the engineered vein graft relative to viral (Adv/RSV-betagal) controls was also observed. CONCLUSION: In vivo tissue engineering is a new paradigm in molecular medicine that is a viable alternative to conventional gene therapy and tissue engineering for the treatment of vascular thrombosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Fuchs, B. A. Nasseri, and J. P. Vacanti
Tissue engineering: a 21st century solution to surgical reconstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 577 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.