American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 599-604, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions

JP Earls, NH Patel, PA Smith, S DeSena and MH Meissner
Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98104, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a rapid and accurate method that can at times image only a limited amount of anatomy during an examination. We evaluated a technique that doubled the anatomy imaged by obtaining two separate gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms during a single examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty- three patients referred for MR evaluation of aortic or peripheral vascular disease underwent two successive gadolinium-enhanced three- dimensional MR angiographic examinations during a single MR examination. An injection of 15 ml of gadopentetate dimeglumine was used for the first MR angiogram, and 25 ml was used for the second MR angiogram. The angiograms were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated to determine the effect of residual gadolinium from the initial MR angiogram on the second angiogram. RESULTS: The two studies depicted either the entire aorta to the femoral arteries (n = 10) or the distal aorta to the popliteal arteries (n = 13). The total mean gadolinium dose was 0.245 mmol/kg per patient. An average of 15 min elapsed between injections. The value of arterial signal-to-noise ratio (mean, 48.8 versus 56.4) and artery-to-vein contrast-to-noise ratio (mean, 45.5 versus 49.0) increased between the first and second angiograms, respectively. Residual gadolinium elevated the values for venous signal-to-noise ratio (mean, 2.3 versus 7.2) and background-to- muscle signal-to-noise ratio (mean, 5.5 versus 10.1) on the second MR angiogram. Qualitative evaluation by three observers showed no significant differences in diagnostic usefulness or overall image quality between the first and second MR angiograms. CONCLUSION: The use of two low-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiograms during a single examination is a feasible approach to increase anatomic coverage when performing gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Although background enhancement is slightly elevated on the second angiogram, such enhancement does not significantly change diagnostic usefulness or overall image quality.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. S. Pereles, J. D. Collins, J. C. Carr, C. Francois, M. D. Morasch, R. M. McCarthy, E. A. Krupinski, G. M. Butler, and J. P. Finn Accuracy of Stepping-Table Lower Extremity MR Angiography with Dual-Level Bolus Timing and Separate Calf Acquisition: Hybrid Peripheral MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 283 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bilecen, A.-C. Schulte, H. G. Heidecker, M. Aschwanden, R. Huegli, K. A. Jaeger, W. Ostheim-Dzerowycz, and G. Bongartz Lower Extremity: Low-Dose Contrast Agent Intraarterial MR Angiography in Patients--Initial Results Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Binkert, P. D. Baker, B. D. Petersen, J. Szumowski, and J. A. Kaufman Peripheral Vascular Disease: Blinded Study of Dedicated Calf MR Angiography versus Standard Bolus-Chase MR Angiography and Film Hard-Copy Angiography Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 860 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Huber, J. Scheidler, B. Wintersperger, A. Baur, M. Schmidt, M. Requardt, N. Holzknecht, T. Helmberger, A. Billing, and M. Reiser Moving-Table MR Angiography of the Peripheral Runoff Vessels: Comparison of Body Coil and Dedicated Phased Array Coil Systems Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1365 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Wyttenbach, S. Gianella, M. Alerci, A. Braghetti, L. Cozzi, and A. Gallino Prospective Blinded Evaluation of Gd-DOTA- versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced Peripheral MR Angiography, as Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 261 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. V. Pandharipande, V. S. Lee, P. M. Reuss, H. W. Charles, R. J. Rosen, G. A. Krinsky, J. C. Weinreb, and N. M. Rofsky Two-Station Bolus-Chase MR Angiography with a Stationary Table: A Simple Alternative to Automated-Table Techniques Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1583 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Loewe, M. Schoder, T. Rand, U. Hoffmann, J. Sailer, T. Kos, J. Lammer, and S. Thurnher Peripheral Vascular Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Moving-Bed MR Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in 106 Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Goyen, H. H. Quick, J. F. Debatin, M. E. Ladd, J. Barkhausen, C. U. Herborn, S. Bosk, H. Kuehl, M. Schleputz, and S. G. Ruehm Whole-Body Three-dimensional MR Angiography with a Rolling Table Platform: Initial Clinical Experience Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 270 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Huber, A. Heuck, A. Baur, T. Helmberger, T. Waggershauser, A. Billing, M. Heiss, R. Petsch, and M. Reiser Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography from the Distal Aorta to the Ankle Joint with a Step-by-Step Technique Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1291 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-F. Kreitner, P. Kalden, A. Neufang, C. Duber, F. Krummenauer, E. Kustner, G. Laub, and M. Thelen Diabetes and Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Prospective Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Angiography with Conventional Digital Subtraction Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 171 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, T. Ishimori, K. Oda, T. Hayashi, A. Hiyama, and Y. Dodo Dynamic Subtraction Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 135 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Shetty, K. G. Bis, A. J. Duerinckx, and V. R. Narra Lower Extremity MR Angiography: Universal Retrofitting of High-Field-Strength Systems with Stepping Kinematic Imaging Platforms—Initial Experience Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 284 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]