AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jara, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jara, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 797-802, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR imaging of hemorrhagic brain lesions: a comparison of dual-echo gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques

ER Melhem, RT Patel, RE Whitehead, RG Bhatia, DT Rockwell and H Jara
Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the usefulness of the dual-echo gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) technique in revealing acute hemorrhagic brain lesions and compare GRASE and fast spin-echo techniques for revealing acute hemorrhagic lesions and image artifacts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage underwent dual-echo GRASE (TEeff1/TEeff2, 35/85) and fast spin-echo (25/110) imaging. The techniques were matched for TR (3032 msec), spatial resolution, and acquisition time. Two neuroradiologists reviewed the images independently, documenting the number, size (<1, >1, or 1 cm in diameter), location, and signal characteristics (hypointense versus hyperintense compared with brain) of detectable lesions. These observers also compared matched T2- and proton density-weighted GRASE and fast spin-echo images for paramagnetic lesion conspicuity, diamagnetic susceptibility artifacts, chemical shift artifacts along the phase- and frequency-encoding directions, and artifactual CSF hyperintensity in the thin curvilinear cortical sulci and the Virchow-Robin spaces on only the proton density- weighted images. RESULTS: The average number and conspicuity of dark (paramagnetic) lesions were significantly greater on GRASE than on fast spin-echo images (p < .05 and p < .001, respectively). We found no significant difference in the average number of bright lesions revealed by either technique (p > .1). Chemical shift artifacts along the phase- encoding directions were more prominent on GRASE than on fast spin-echo imaging. Chemical shift artifacts along the frequency-encoding directions and artifactual CSF hyperintensity were more prominent on fast spin-echo than on GRASE imaging. No visually apparent difference was found in the degree of diamagnetic susceptibility artifacts seen with the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Dual-echo GRASE imaging can be helpful in the examination of patients with suspected acute brain hemorrhage.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. R. Melhem
Reply
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 1998; 20(7): 1382 - 1383.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.