|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 803-807, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
ER Melhem, RJ Bert and RE Walker
Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement of lesions of the brain revealed by gadolinium-enhanced optimized fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging with that of lesions on gadolinium-enhanced optimized T1-weighted spin- echo MR imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using computer simulations, we optimized the fast FLAIR parameters (TR, TEeff, and inversion time) and the T1-weighted spin-echo parameters (TR and TE) to provide maximum difference in signal intensity between enhancing lesions of the brain and white matter. Seventy-six consecutive patients referred for single- dose gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the brain underwent both optimized techniques, which were matched for spatial resolution, bandwidth, and number of excitations. The gadolinium-enhanced fast FLAIR and T -weighted spin-echo MR images were evaluated independently by two observers for number and size of enhancing lesions and for the degree of gray-white matter differentiation. Contrast-to-noise ratios were measured for enhancing lesions 1.0 cm or larger in diameter using 8 x 8 pixel regions of interest in the enhancing lesions and normal white matter. RESULTS: The most revealing parameters for fast FLAIR MR imaging proved to be a TR of 1500 msec, an inversion time of 683 msec, and a TEeff of 16 msec. For T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging, the optimized parameters were a TR of 550 msec and a TE of 16 msec. In 28 patients, we saw enhancing lesions of the brain with at least one MR imaging technique. More lesions were seen on the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (n = 141) than on the fast FLAIR sequence (n = 94) (p < .03). Gray-white matter differentiation was significantly better on the fast FLAIR sequence (p < .001). Contrast-to-noise ratios of enhancing lesions were greater on the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (p < .001). CONCLUSION: In this study, optimized gadolinium-enhanced conventional T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging proved superior to gadolinium-enhanced fast FLAIR MR imaging in revealing lesions of the brain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-F. Qian, C.-L. Yu, C. Zhang, and Y.-Q. Yu MR T1-Weighted Inversion Recovery Imaging in Detecting Brain Metastases: Could It Replace T1-Weighted Spin-Echo Imaging? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 701 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ercan, S. Gultekin, H. Celik, T. E. Tali, Y. A. Oner, and G. Erbas Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Imaging of Intracranial Metastases AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 761 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yoon, H.-J. Shin, and Y. W. Chang "Ivy Sign" in Childhood Moyamoya Disease: Depiction on FLAIR and Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Images Radiology, March 21, 2002; (2002) 2232011094. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsuchiya, S. Katase, A. Yoshino, and J. Hachiya FLAIR MR Imaging for Diagnosing Intracranial Meningeal Carcinomatosis Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1585 - 1588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Herlihy, J. V. Hajnal, W. L. Curati, N. Virji, A. Oatridge, B. K. Puri, and G. M. Bydder Reduction of CSF and Blood Flow Artifacts on FLAIR Images of the Brain with k-Space Reordered by Inversion Time at each Slice Position (KRISP) AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 896 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Singh, J. M. Agris, N. E. Leeds, and L. E. Ginsberg Intracranial Leptomeningeal Metastases: Comparison of Depiction at FLAIR and Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 50 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yoon, H.-J. Shin, and Y. W. Chang "Ivy Sign" in Childhood Moyamoya Disease: Depiction on FLAIR and Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Images Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |