AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 1097-1101, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Real-time CT fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage

CA Meyer, CS White, J Wu, SF Futterer and PA Templeton
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to review the application of real-time CT fluoroscopy in the drainage of localized pleural and mediastinal collections. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between July 1996 and August 1997, 20 patients with 10 loculated pleural effusions, two mediastinal fluid collections, and 12 focal pneumothoraces were treated using CT fluoroscopy. The patient population was 25-77 years old and included 14 men and six women. Methods of drainage included using a modified Seldinger technique with a guidewire and serial dilators in 10 patients and a single-stick trocar technique in the remaining 14. Total room time, procedure time, and CT fluoroscopy time were recorded. RESULTS: All 24 collections were successfully evacuated using either real-time or interrupted real-time CT fluoroscopy. The real-time capability of CT fluoroscopy proved particularly useful for rapid placement of drainage tubes in patients who were unable to cooperate with breathing instructions and in patients who had a narrow window of access. Average total room time was 65 min. Average procedure time was 32 min, and average CT fluoroscopy time was 143 sec. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy permits rapid drainage of intrathoracic collections. CT fluoroscopy is a particularly useful treatment for patients who are unable to perform breath-holding or in whom access to the drainage site is difficult.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R YOSHIMATSU, T YAMAGAMI, T KATO, T HIROTA, T MATSUMOTO, J SHIMADA, and T NISHIMURA
Percutaneous needle biopsy of lung nodules under CT fluoroscopic guidance with use of the "I-I device"
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. L. Wagner
Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Blocks with CT Fluoroscopic Guidance: Technique, Results, Procedure Time, and Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2004; 25(9): 1592 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Sakarya, O. Unal, B. Ozbay, K. Uzun, I. Kati, S. Ozen, and O. Etlik
MR Fluoroscopy-guided Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Feasibility
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 589 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Keat
Real-time CT and CT fluoroscopy
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1088 - 1090.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. K. Paulson, D. H. Sheafor, D. S. Enterline, H. P. McAdams, and T. T. Yoshizumi
CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures: Techniques and Radiation Dose to Radiologists
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, S. G. Silverman, S. Hooton, K. Tuncali, and D. F. Adams
Patient and Personnel Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 180 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. H. Sheafor, E. K. Paulson, M. A. Kliewer, D. M. DeLong, and R. C. Nelson
Comparison of Sonographic and CT Guidance Techniques: Does CT Fluoroscopy Decrease Procedure Time?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 939 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, K. Tuncali, D. F. Adams, R. D. Nawfel, K. H. Zou, and P. F. Judy
CT Fluoroscopy-guided Abdominal Interventions: Techniques, Results, and Radiation Exposure
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 673 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Daly and P. A. Templeton
Real-time CT Fluoroscopy: Evolution of an Interventional Tool
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 309 - 315.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.