|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 1607-1610, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
JR Fielding, DJ Griffiths, E Versi, RV Mulkern, ML Lee and FA Jolesz
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the anatomic differences in pelvic floor anatomy for continent women and women with stress incontinence using MR imaging and to assess whether these anatomic differences depend on the position of the subject during imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight continent volunteers and eight women with stress incontinence underwent MR imaging in the supine and sitting positions. For imaging, we used an open-configuration 0.5-T magnet. T2-weighted images were obtained in the midline sagittal plane with subjects at rest and at maximal pelvic floor strain in 5 sec using a modified fast spin-echo sequence. In the axial plane, thin-section T2-weighted images were obtained with subjects at rest using a standard fast spin-echo technique. Images were evaluated for mobility of the urethra and bladder neck and for integrity of the vagina, levator ani, and supporting fascia. RESULTS: Pelvic floor laxity and abnormalities of the supporting fascia were more common in incontinent women than in continent women. Both descent of the bladder neck when subjects strained and the posterior urethrovesical angle were not significantly greater when subjects were measured in the sitting position (p < .1). CONCLUSION: Changes of pelvic floor laxity related to incontinence can be seen with subjects in both the supine and the sitting positions but are increased in the sitting position.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Boyadzhyan, S. S. Raman, and S. Raz Role of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging in Surgical Pelvic Floor Dysfunction RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 949 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cortes, W. M. N. Reid, K. Singh, and L. Berger Clinical Examination and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2004; 103(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Kim, Y. J. Kim, M. S. Choo, and K.-S. Cho The Urethra and Its Supporting Structures in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: MR Imaging Using an Endovaginal Coil Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. deSouza, O. J. Daniels, A. D. Williams, D. J. Gilderdale, and P. D. Abel Female Urinary Genuine Stress Incontinence: Anatomic Considerations at MR Imaging of the Paravaginal Fascia and Urethra—Initial Observations Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 433 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. A. Michel, A. Rake, K. Treiber, B. Seifert, R. Chaoui, R. Huch, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch MR Obstetric Pelvimetry: Effect of Birthing Position on Pelvic Bony Dimensions Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 1063 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Bertschinger, F. H. Hetzer, J. E. Roos, K. Treiber, B. Marincek, and P. R. Hilfiker Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor Performed with Patient Sitting in an Open-Magnet Unit versus with Patient Supine in a Closed-Magnet Unit Radiology, May 1, 2002; (2002) 2232010665. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Fielding Practical MR Imaging of Female Pelvic Floor Weakness RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 295 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Unterweger, B. Marincek, N. Gottstein-Aalame, J. F. Debatin, B. Seifert, N. Ochsenbein-Imhof, D. Perucchini, and R. A. Kubik-Huch Ultrafast MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 959 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Fielding, H. Dumanli, A. G. Schreyer, S. Okuda, D. T. Gering, K. H. Zou, R. Kikinis, and F. A. Jolesz MR-Based Three-Dimensional Modeling of the Normal Pelvic Floor in Women: Quantification of Muscle Mass Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 657 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goh, S. Halligan, G. Kaplan, J. C. Healy, and C. I. Bartram Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor in Asymptomatic Subjects Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 661 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Kelvin, D. D. T. Maglinte, D. S. Hale, and J. T. Benson Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comparison of Triphasic Dynamic MR Imaging and Triphasic Fluoroscopic Cystocolpoproctography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Bertschinger, F. H. Hetzer, J. E. Roos, K. Treiber, B. Marincek, and P. R. Hilfiker Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor Performed with Patient Sitting in an Open-Magnet Unit versus with Patient Supine in a Closed-Magnet Unit Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |