|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 107-112, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
C Chartrand-Lefebvre, N Howarth, O Lucidarme, C Beigelman, P Cluzel, I Mourey- Gerosa, M Cadi and P Grenier
Department of Radiology, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), France.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate inter- and intraobserver agreement in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism using contrast-enhanced helical CT among observers with variable experience in the interpretation of pulmonary CT angiograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT angiograms of 60 patients clinically suspected of having pulmonary embolism were analyzed retrospectively and independently by two chest radiologists, one cardiovascular radiologist, and three general radiologists. The films were rated a second time by the chest radiologists to assess intraobserver variability. Findings for pulmonary embolism were categorized as positive, negative, or indeterminate at the main, lobar, and segmental pulmonary artery levels. RESULTS: The observers interpreted 19-21 CT angiograms as positive for pulmonary embolism (mean, 19.7) and one to six as indeterminate (mean, 3.2). Agreement occurred among all observers in 50 patients (83.3%), among five observers in six patients (10.0%), among four observers in three patients (5.0%), and among three observers in one patient (1.7%). Interobserver agreement was very good (kappa, .85) for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on a per-patient basis. Agreement on a per-artery basis for all arteries was moderate (66%; kappa, .56); for lobar arteries was good (83%; kappa, .75); and for segmental arteries was moderate (57%; kappa, .47). Mean intraobserver agreement on a per-patient basis was very good (93%; kappa, .87). CONCLUSION: Inter- and intraobserver agreement in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with helical CT is very good despite a wide variety of experience among radiologists.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Jones and C. Wittram The Indeterminate CT Pulmonary Angiogram: Imaging Characteristics and Patient Clinical Outcome Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Revel, D. Petrover, A. Hernigou, C. Lefort, G. Meyer, and G. Frija Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism with Four-Detector Row Helical CT: Prospective Evaluation of 216 Outpatients and Inpatients Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Ginsberg, V. King, and D. M. Panicek Comparison of Interpretations of CT Angiograms in the Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism by On-Call Radiology Fellows and Subsequently by Radiology Faculty Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Arakawa, Y. Kurihara, K. Sasaka, Y. Nakajima, and W. R. Webb Air Trapping on CT of Patients with Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1201 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. R. van Beek, E. M. J. Brouwers, Bing Song, A. H. H. Bongaerts, and M. Oudkerk Lung Scintigraphy and Helical Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Garg, J. L. Kemp, P. D. Russ, and A. E. Baron Thromboembolic Disease: Variability of Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of CT Venography with CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 1043 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Raptopoulos and P. M. Boiselle Multi-Detector Row Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison with Single-Detector Row Spiral CT Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 606 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |