American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 53-56, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics

JF Platt, KA Reige and JH Ellis
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0030, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the effect of contrast material injection rate and patient demographic variables on vascular enhancement for abdominal CT angiography and compare test injection results with actual patterns of vascular enhancement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent abdominal CT angiography. For each patient, CT attenuation values (Hounsfield units) of the aorta were determined before and after IV contrast administration, every 3 sec between 21 and 60 sec. A peak aortic enhancement value and the time needed to reach peak and aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H were determined. All patients received 150 ml of nonionic contrast material at 3 ml/sec in 25 patients and 4 ml/sec in 100 patients. A test injection of 15 ml was used to compute a scan delay in 46 patients. Patient age, sex, weight, injection rate, and test injection results were compared with vascular enhancement patterns. RESULTS: For the 125 patients, the mean aortic enhancement at each time point was greater than 150 H. Patient weight was inversely correlated (r2 = -.62) with aortic enhancement. The test injection did not accurately predict actual aortic enhancement peak value or time. Test injection delay time was significantly correlated with time to reach aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H. The 4 ml/sec rate resulted in a higher peak aortic enhancement (320+/-58 H versus 281+/-49 H) (mean +/- SD, p < .01) that was reached quicker than with the 3 ml/sec injection rate (45+/-5 sec versus 52+/-5 sec) (p < .01). Injecting at 4 ml/sec resulted in greater aortic enhancement values at 24-45 sec, whereas 3 ml/sec produced significantly better aortic enhancement at 54-60 sec. CONCLUSION: The test injection correlated better with time to reach specific aortic enhancement thresholds than with time to peak aortic enhancement. For a given amount of contrast material, faster injection rates resulted in greater vascular enhancement that occurred earlier.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. T. Bae, B. A. Seeck, C. F. Hildebolt, C. Tao, F. Zhu, M. Kanematsu, and P. K. Woodard Contrast Enhancement in Cardiovascular MDCT: Effect of Body Weight, Height, Body Surface Area, Body Mass Index, and Obesity Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, and D. M. DeLong Determining Contrast Medium Dose and Rate on Basis of Lean Body Weight: Does This Strategy Improve Patient-to-Patient Uniformity of Hepatic Enhancement during Multi-Detector Row CT? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Bae, C. Tao, S. Gurel, C. Hong, F. Zhu, T. A. Gebke, M. Milite, and C. F. Hildebolt Effect of Patient Weight and Scanning Duration on Contrast Enhancement during Pulmonary Multidetector CT Angiography Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 582 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Schoellnast, H. A. Deutschmann, A. Berghold, G. A. Fritz, G. J. Schaffler, and M. Tillich MDCT Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries: Influence of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, and Scan Length on Arterial Enhancement at Different Iodine Flow Rates Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1074 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Utsunomiya, K. Awai, Y. Tamura, T. Nishiharu, J. Urata, T. Sakamoto, A. Taniguchi, and Y. Yamashita 16-MDCT Aortography with a Low-Dose Contrast Material Protocol Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 374 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Awai, A. Hatcho, Y. Nakayama, S. Kusunoki, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, M. Denbo, N. Sato, and Y. Yamashita Simulation of Aortic Peak Enhancement on MDCT Using a Contrast Material Flow Phantom: Feasibility Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. de Monye, F. Cademartiri, T. T. de Weert, D. A. M. Siepman, D. W. J. Dippel, and A. van Der Lugt Sixteen-Detector Row CT Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Different Volumes of Contrast Material with and without a Bolus Chaser Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. Uggowitzer, T. Meissnitzer, and G. Ruppert Differentiation of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Renal Papillary Carcinoma Using Quantitative CT Enhancement Parameters Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1387 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, J. Thomas, E. I. Gimenez, and D. M. DeLong Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT: Optimization with Interactive Determination of Scanning Delay and Contrast Medium Dose Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 854 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Vernhet, J. M. Serfaty, M. Serhal, E. McFadden, E. Bonnefoy, P. Adeleine, D. Revel, and P. Douek Abdominal CT Angiography Before Surgery as a Predictor of Postoperative Death in Acute Aortic Dissection Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 875 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Awai, K. Hiraishi, and S. Hori Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, N. J. McNulty, J. F. Platt, M. Korobkin, A. Gebremariam, and K. Ragupathi Multidetector CT of the Liver and Hepatic Neoplasms: Effect of Multiphasic Imaging on Tumor Conspicuity and Vascular Enhancement Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1217 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Macari, G. M. Israel, P. Berman, M. Lisi, A. J. Tolia, M. Adelman, and A. J. Megibow Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Intravascular Enhancement without a Timing Acquisition Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 519 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kim, M. P. Federle, R. L. Baron, M. S. Peterson, and Y. Kawamori Discrimination of Small Hepatic Hemangiomas from Hypervascular Malignant Tumors Smaller than 3 cm with Three-Phase Helical CT Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 699 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. H. Choe, L. H. Phyun, and B.-K. Han Biphasic and Discontinuous Injection of Contrast Material for Thin-Section Helical CT Angiography of the Whole Aorta and Iliac Arteries Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 454 - 456. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Fleischmann, G. D. Rubin, A. A. Bankier, and K. Hittmair Improved Uniformity of Aortic Enhancement with Customized Contrast Medium Injection Protocols at CT Angiography Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text]