AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sica, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Raemer, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sica, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Raemer, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 301-304, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Computerized realistic simulation: a teaching module for crisis management in radiology

GT Sica, DM Barron, R Blum, TH Frenna and DB Raemer
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Computerized realistic simulation technology has been used as a training tool in fields such as aviation and military training and in the nuclear power industry. More recently, it has been adapted for use in anesthesia crisis resource management. We describe the effectiveness of a simulation program like that used by anesthesiology departments that we developed to teach radiologists the principles of crisis management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mock CT scanner and patient simulator were used to simulate the environment in which radiologists encounter crises. Twenty-four residents attended the training program, four at each half-day session. Two responded to and two observed an initial crisis, after which they attended a lecture and watched a videotape review. The second pair then participated in a different crisis scenario. The scenario order was randomized. All scenarios were videotaped and randomly reviewed by two physicians not involved with the course. The following behavioral qualities of the participating residents were evaluated using a five-point scale, ranging from poor (1) to excellent (5): global assessment, communication skills, use of support personnel, use of resources, and role clarity. Residents then rated the course on a five-point scale using the following criteria: overall course usefulness, attainment of course goals, realism of scenarios, quality of lecture, and quality of videotape review. RESULTS: The trainees who had attended the lecture and watched the videotape review before participating in a scenario consistently scored higher than those who had not in the following areas (score after training/score before training): global assessment, 4.08/2.50; communication skills, 4.09/2.67; use of support personnel, 4.17/3.00; use of resources, 4.00/2.92; and role clarity, 4.17/2.67. Moreover, the participants gave the course the following average ratings: overall usefulness, 4.93; attainment of course goals, 4.78; realism of scenarios, 4.63; quality of lecture, 4.63; and quality of videotape review, 4.85. CONCLUSION: Although the critical assessment of a teaching method is difficult and subjective by nature, the improvement in behavioral performance scores suggests that simulation technology effectively conveyed the principles of crisis management. The course ratings show that the program was well accepted by participants.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J B Cooper and V R Taqueti
A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2008; 84(997): 563 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. B. Brett-Fleegler, R. J. Vinci, D. L. Weiner, S. K. Harris, M.-C. Shih, and M. E. Kleinman
A Simulator-Based Tool That Assesses Pediatric Resident Resuscitation Competency
Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e597 - e603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M A DeVita, J Schaefer, J Lutz, H Wang, and T Dongilli
Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 326 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
D M Gaba
The future vision of simulation in health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(suppl_1): i2 - i10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J B Cooper and V R Taqueti
A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(suppl_1): i11 - i18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. A. Olympio, R. Whelan, R. P. A. Ford, and I. C. M. Saunders
Failure of simulation training to change residents' management of oesophageal intubation{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 312 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
D. M. Gaba, S. J. Singer, A. D. Sinaiko, J. D. Bowen, and A. P. Ciavarelli
Differences in Safety Climate between Hospital Personnel and Naval Aviators
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2003; 45(2): 173 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.