AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takebayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Matsubara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takebayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Matsubara, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 429-433, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Using helical CT to evaluate renal cell carcinoma in patients undergoing hemodialysis: value of early enhanced images

S Takebayashi, H Hidai, T Chiba, H Takagi, S Koike and S Matsubara
Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early and delayed enhanced helical CT for revealing renal cell carcinoma in patients undergoing hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over the course of 3 years, 630 chronic hemodialysis patients underwent early and delayed contrast-enhanced and unenhanced helical CT to detect renal cell carcinoma. Retrospective review showed that 23 of these patients later underwent either unilateral or bilateral nephrectomy. Two radiologists, unaware of the pathology results, independently reviewed these 23 examinations. The sensitivity and specificity of each early and delayed scan for revealing neoplasms were determined using pathology as the gold standard. The mean attenuation values of the neoplasms and parenchymas of end-stage kidneys on both early and delayed enhanced images were also compared. RESULTS: Helical CT revealed 225 lesions, 24 of which were found to be renal cell carcinomas at pathology. Delayed enhanced helical CT failed to detect one papillary carcinoma in an end- stage kidney with acquired cysts. Three nonpapillary carcinomas were not detected on delayed scans, and one was missed on an early scan of a patient without acquired cysts. The sensitivity and specificity of early enhanced CT for revealing renal cell carcinoma were 96% and 95%, respectively. In contrast, delayed enhanced CT achieved a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 94%. A significant difference in mean attenuation values between carcinomas and renal parenchymas was observed on the images with early enhancement but not on those with delayed enhancement (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Early enhanced helical CT is superior to delayed enhanced helical CT for revealing renal cell carcinoma in end-stage kidneys.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.