AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Right arrow Articles by Leef, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Right arrow Articles by Leef, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 493-496, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Experience with tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters

GX Zaleski, B Funaki, JM Lorenz, RS Garofalo, MA Moscatel, JD Rosenblum and JA Leef
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, IL 60637, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use and complication rate of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters placed in patients with no remaining thoracic venous access sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 41 tunneled femoral vein catheters (35 right, six left) were placed in 21 patients (15 women, six men; 21-89 years old; mean, 52 years). Catheters ranged in length from 40 to 60 cm. Tips were positioned immediately above the iliac bifurcation, at the mid inferior vena cava (IVC), or at the junction of the IVC and right atrium. Catheters were exchanged through the existing tract if the flow rate decreased to less than 200 ml/min. Catheters were removed if an episode of bacteremia did not resolve with antibiotics or if the insertion site became infected. RESULTS: Technical success of placement was 100%. The 30-, 60-, and 180-day primary patency rates were 78%, 71%, and 55%, respectively. The 30-, 60-, and 180-day secondary patency rates were 95%, 83%, and 61%, respectively. Average time of function per intervention was 61 days. Infections requiring catheter removal occurred at a rate of 2.4 per 1000 catheter days. One episode of partial IVC thrombosis occurred after a catheter infection developed 78 days after initial catheter placement. No episodes of symptomatic pulmonary embolism occurred. Total length of follow-up was 2506 catheter days. CONCLUSION: Femoral vein catheters require more frequent interventions than do thoracic catheters and are more susceptible to infection. However, in patients with difficult central venous access, the common femoral vein may be successfully used for permanent tunneled hemodialysis access.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Falk
Use of the brachiocephalic vein for placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 773 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Betz, D. Kraus, C. Muller, and H. Geiger
Iliac cuffed tunnelled catheters for chronic haemodialysis vascular access
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 2009 - 2012.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. P. Smith, J. M. Ryan, and D. N. Reddan
Transhepatic Catheter Access for Hemodialysis
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 246 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mickley
Central venous catheters: many questions, few answers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1368 - 1373.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Funaki
Central Venous Access: A Primer for the Diagnostic Radiologist
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 309 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Funaki, G. X. Zaleski, J. A. Leef, J. N. Lorenz, T. Van Ha, and J. D. Rosenblum
Radiologic Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters in Occluded Neck, Chest, or Small Thyrocervical Collateral Veins in Central Venous Occlusion
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 471 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. E. Sewell Jr., E. D. Lawson, and J. D. Tanner
Placement of Transmediastinal Dialysis Catheters Using MR Imaging Guidance
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 233 - 234.
[Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Buerger, T. Gebauer, F. Meyer, and Z. Halloul
Implantation of a new device for haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 722 - 724.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. R. Forauer, B. Brenner, L. F. Haddad, and T. P. Bocchini
Placement of Hemodialysis Catheters Through Dilated External Jugular and Collateral Veins in Patients with Internal Jugular Vein Occlusions
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 361 - 362.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.