|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 913-918, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
MM Morrin, JB Kruskal, RJ Farrell, SN Goldberg, JB McGee and V Raptopoulos
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 40 patients in whom the cecum could not be reached endoscopically despite adequate bowel preparation. Endoluminal CT colonography (120 kVp, 120 mA, 3-mm collimation, pitch of 2, 1.5-mm interval reconstruction) was performed within 2 hr of incomplete colonoscopy. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three- dimensional endoluminal images were analyzed. Twenty-six patients (65%) underwent barium enema immediately after endoluminal CT colonography. We analyzed colonic distention; duration of endoluminal CT colonography; patient tolerance; number of colonic segments seen at colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography, and barium enema; and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy as well as colonic and extracolonic findings. RESULTS: Duration of endoluminal CT colonography was 14.2 +/- 4.6 min (mean +/- SD). Endoluminal CT colonography was better tolerated than colonoscopy or barium enema (p < .001). Probable causes for incomplete colonoscopy were identified at endoluminal CT colonography in 74% of 40 patients. Baseline colonic distention in the region of the transverse and right colon was considered adequate before additional air insufflation; however, the addition of air significantly enhanced colonic distention throughout the entire colon (p < .001). Endoluminal CT colonography adequately revealed 96% of all colonic segments; in comparison, barium enema adequately revealed 91% of all segments (p < .05). CONCLUSION: In patients with incomplete colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography successfully showed the previously unrevealed colon in more than 90% of patients. Endoluminal CT colonography is a rapid, well- tolerated technique that provides clinically useful colonic and extracolonic information and should be considered for all patients who undergo incomplete colonoscopy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Y. Kim, S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. S. Lee, K. H. Lee, J. C. Kim, C. S. Yu, H. C. Kim, A. Y. Kim, and H. K. Ha Automated Carbon Dioxide Insufflation for CT Colonography: Effectiveness of Colonic Distention in Cancer Patients with Severe Luminal Narrowing Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 698 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yucel, A. S. Lev-Toaff, N. Moussa, and H. Durrani CT Colonography for Incomplete or Contraindicated Optical Colonoscopy in Older Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. M. Tolan, E. M. Armstrong, and A. H. Chapman Replacing Barium Enema with CT Colonography in Patients Older Than 70 Years: The Importance of Detecting Extracolonic Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1104 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Hanson, P. J. Pickhardt, D. H. Kim, and P. R. Pfau Anatomic Factors Predictive of Incomplete Colonoscopy Based on Findings at CT Colonography Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 774 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Copel, J. Sosna, J. B. Kruskal, V. Raptopoulos, R. J. Farrell, and M. M. Morrin CT Colonography in 546 Patients with Incomplete Colonoscopy Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 471 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Torres, S. Szomstein, and S. D. Wexner Virtual Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Young, J. G. Fletcher, F. Earnest, J. L. Fidler, R. L. MacCarty, C. D. Johnson, J. E. Huprich, and D. Hough Colonic Perforation at CT Colonography in a Patient Without Known Colonic Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 119 - 121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Halligan, D. G. Altman, S. A. Taylor, S. Mallett, J. J. Deeks, C. I. Bartram, and W. Atkin CT Colonography in the Detection of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Proposed Minimum Data Set for Study Level Reporting Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 893 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macari and E. J. Bini CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 819 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ajaj, T. C. Lauenstein, G. Pelster, G. Holtmann, S. G. Ruehm, J. F. Debatin, and S. C. Goehde MR Colonography in Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 452 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Xiong, M Richardson, R Woodroffe, S Halligan, D Morton, and R J Lilford Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(925): 22 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hellstrom, M. H. Svensson, and A. Lasson Extracolonic and Incidental Findings on CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy) Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macari, E. J. Bini, S. L. Jacobs, S. Naik, Y. W. Lui, A. Milano, R. Rajapaksa, A. J. Megibow, and J. Babb Colorectal Polyps and Cancers in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Patients: Evaluation with CT Colonography Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 629 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sosna, M. M. Morrin, J. B. Kruskal, R. J. Farrell, I. Nasser, and V. Raptopoulos Colorectal Neoplasms: Role of Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT Colonography Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 152 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yee CT Screening for Colorectal Cancer RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1525 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chong, J. N. Shah, M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, I. Laufer, G. G. Ginsberg, W. B. Long, and M. L. Kochman Diagnostic Yield of Barium Enema Examination after Incomplete Colonoscopy Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 620 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Neri, P. Giusti, L. Battolla, P. Vagli, P. Boraschi, R. Lencioni, D. Caramella, and C. Bartolozzi Colorectal Cancer: Role of CT Colonography in Preoperative Evaluation after Incomplete Colonoscopy Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 615 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Gollub, M. S. Ginsberg, C. Cooper, and H. T. Thaler Quality of Virtual Colonoscopy in Patients Who Have Undergone Radiation Therapy or Surgery: How Successful Are We? Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1109 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Keogan and R. R. Edelman Technologic Advances in Abdominal MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 310 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Summers, C. D. Johnson, L. M. Pusanik, J. D. Malley, A. M. Youssef, and J. E. Reed Automated Polyp Detection at CT Colonography: Feasibility Assessment in a Human Population Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 51 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Morrin, R. J. Farrell, J. B. Kruskal, K. Reynolds, J. B. McGee, and V. Raptopoulos Utility of Intravenously Administered Contrast Material at CT Colonography Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Johnson and A. H. Dachman CT Colonography: The Next Colon Screening Examination? Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 331 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Svensson, E. Svensson, A. Lasson, and M. Hellstrom Patient Acceptance of CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy: Prospective Comparative Study in Patients with or Suspected of Having Colorectal Disease Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Lauenstein, S. C. Goehde, S. G. Ruehm, G. Holtmann, and J. F. Debatin MR Colonography with Barium-based Fecal Tagging: Initial Clinical Experience Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |