AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suhocki, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suhocki, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, W. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 955-959, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay

PV Suhocki and WC Meyers
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of injured aberrant bile ducts in a population with complications after cholecystectomy and to determine whether such injury resulted in significant delay in the diagnosis and treatment of bile duct injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cholangiograms of 82 patients who sustained bile duct injury during cholecystectomy were reviewed. Prevalence of aberrant bile duct anatomy in the injured ducts was noted. The time periods from injury to diagnosis and treatment of bile duct leaks in patients with aberrant bile duct anatomy were compared with those in patients with normal anatomy. RESULTS: Seventeen percent (14/82) of the patients were found to have aberrant bile duct anatomy. Fifteen percent (12/82) were found to have had an aberrant bile duct involved in the injury. Eleven of the patients had an aberrant bile duct leak, and one patient had an aberrant bile duct clipping injury. The time period required for diagnosis and treatment of a leaking aberrant bile duct was significantly longer (p < .005) than that required for a bile leak in an anatomically normal bile duct. CONCLUSION: Aberrant bile ducts are present in a significant number of patients who sustain bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Diagnosis of an aberrant bile duct leak may be delayed because of nonfilling of the bile duct during standard cholangiographic techniques. Careful examination of cholangiograms for nonfilling segments and contrast material injection of biloma drains and T tubes may shorten the time to definitive treatment for this group of patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Yu, M. A. Turner, A. S. Fulcher, and R. A. Halvorsen
Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 1, Biliary tract.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1536 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Vitellas, A. El-Dieb, K. K. Vaswani, W. F. Bennett, J. Fromkes, C. Ellison, and J. G. Bova
Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Cholangiography with IV Mangafodipir Trisodium (Teslascan) to Evaluate Bile Duct Leaks After Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study of 11 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Hirao, A. Miyazaki, T. Fujimoto, I. Isomoto, and K. Hayashi
Evaluation of Aberrant Bile Ducts Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Helical CT Cholangiography Versus MR Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 713 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.