AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheafor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheafor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 961-968, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous- dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma

DH Sheafor, MG Frederick, EK Paulson, MT Keogan, DM DeLong and RC Nelson
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate triple-phase helical CT for detection of hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients were studied prospectively with triple-phase helical CT in 300 consecutive examinations. Hepatic arterial-dominant and portal venous-dominant phase scans were initiated at 20 and 65 sec, respectively, after IV injection of 175 ml of iopamidol (30 mg/ml) at 5 ml/sec. Three independent observers each reviewed 200 cases of the portal venous-dominant phase for lesion number, conspicuity, and attenuation. Subsequently, portal venous- dominant phase images were reevaluated in conjunction with hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images. RESULTS: Hepatic metastases were identified in 79 (26%) of 300 cases. Lesions detected on portal venous-dominant, hepatic arterial-dominant, and unenhanced images were as follows: observer 1, n = 198, 164, and 171; observer 2, n = 254, 233, and 233; and observer 3, n = 291, 270, and 276 (p > .05). The mean total lesion count was 387, with more lesions detected on portal venous-dominant phase than on either hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images (p < .001 and p < .0001, respectively). For individual observers, 10-26% of lesions were hypervascular on hepatic arterial-dominant phase images. Two to 4% of lesions were identified only on hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images. However, in these few cases, the lesions either were false-positives or were seen in conjunction with additional metastases on portal venous- dominant images. CONCLUSION: Routine use of triple-phase CT in patients with breast carcinoma may not be warranted: Addition of the hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images revealed few additional lesions in our group of 300 patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. H. McCollough, L. Guimaraes, and J. G. Fletcher
In Defense of Body CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 28 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Soyer, M. Poccard, M. Boudiaf, M. Abitbol, L. Hamzi, Y. Panis, P. Valleur, and R. Rymer
Detection of Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases at Triple-Phase Helical CT: Sensitivity of Phases and Comparison with Surgical and Histopathologic Findings
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. Danet, R. C. Semelka, P. Leonardou, L. Braga, G. Vaidean, J. T. Woosley, and M. Kanematsu
Spectrum of MRI Appearances of Untreated Metastases of the Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 809 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, N. J. McNulty, J. F. Platt, M. Korobkin, A. Gebremariam, and K. Ragupathi
Multidetector CT of the Liver and Hepatic Neoplasms: Effect of Multiphasic Imaging on Tumor Conspicuity and Vascular Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1217 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. C. Eberhardt, P. H. Choi, A. M. Bach, S. A. Funt, H. E. Felderman, and L. E. Hann
Utility of Sonography for Small Hepatic Lesions Found on Computed Tomography in Patients With Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-C. Kim, A. Y. Kim, J. K. Han, J. W. Chung, J. Y. Lee, J. H. Park, and B. I. Choi
Hepatic Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Helical CT in Patients Treated with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Added Value of Unenhanced Images
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 773 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. A. Bluemke, E. K. Paulson, M. A. Choti, S. DeSena, and P. A. Clavien
Detection of Hepatic Lesions in Candidates for Surgery: Comparison of Ferumoxides-Enhanced MR Imaging and Dual-Phase Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1653 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. O'Malley, E. Halpern, P. R. Mueller, and G. S. Gazelle
Helical CT Protocols for the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Survey
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. L. Spielmann, R. C. Nelson, C. R. Lowry, G. A. Johnson, G. Sundaramoothy, D. H. Sheafor, and E. K. Paulson
Liver: Single Breath-hold Dynamic Subtraction CT with Multi-Detector Row Helical Technology—Feasibility Study
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 278 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.