American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1207-1212, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Interobserver variability in determining enhancement of renal masses on helical CT

CL Siegel, AJ Fisher and HF Bennett
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Because enhancing renal masses are often surgically excised, we assessed interobserver variability in determining enhancement of renal masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine complicated cysts or solid lesions were imaged with helical CT. Simple cysts (n = 20) were included, for a total of 69 lesions. Three radiologists obtained three region-of-interest measurements for each lesion in the unenhanced and nephrographic phases. Enhancement was defined as an attenuation increase of 15 H or more, provided that partial volume effects were not the cause. Observer concordance was defined as agreement among all three observers on whether a lesion was enhancing or nonenhancing. Measurement-interpretation agreement was defined as an observer's measuring an attenuation increase of less than 15 H and interpreting the lesion as nonenhancing or measuring an increase of 15 H or greater and interpreting the lesion as enhancing. RESULTS: For the 20 simple cysts, observer concordance was 100% and measurement-interpretation agreement was 100%. For the 49 complicated lesions, observer concordance was 90% and measurement-interpretation agreement was 84% (41/49). Of the five discordant lesions, three were 1.1 or 1.0 cm in size and were interpreted as being of high attenuation on the unenhanced scans, with enhancement, versus a high-attenuation mass with increasing attenuation attributed to volume averaging. The remaining two discordant observations were due to differing interpretations of normally enhancing renal parenchyma versus cyst wall or tumor nodularity. CONCLUSION: For most renal lesions, the observers agreed on whether enhancement was present or absent. Observers were prone to disagree about enhancement for small lesions (1.0-1.5 cm). Occasional disagreements on classification of larger lesions were due to differing interpretations of enhancing normal parenchyma versus abnormal tissue. Discrepancies between an observer's opinion on enhancement and the results of region-of-interest measurements suggest the possibility of disagreement among multiple observers.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Benjaminov, M. Atri, M. O'Malley, K. Lobo, and G. Tomlinson Enhancing Component on CT to Predict Malignancy in Cystic Renal Masses and Interobserver Agreement of Different CT Features. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Hecht, G. M. Israel, G. A. Krinsky, W. Y. Hahn, D. C. Kim, I. Belitskaya-Levy, and V. S. Lee Renal Masses: Quantitative Analysis of Enhancement with Signal Intensity Measurements versus Qualitative Analysis of Enhancement with Image Subtraction for Diagnosing Malignancy at MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jinzaki, J. D. McTavish, K. H. Zou, P. F. Judy, and S. G. Silverman Evaluation of Small (<= 3 cm) Renal Masses with MDCT: Benefits of Thin Overlapping Reconstructions Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 223 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Chung, B. R. Herts, G. Linnell, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, D. M. Coll, and M. E. Baker Analysis of Changes in Attenuation of Proven Renal Cysts on Different Scanning Phases of Triphasic MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Berlin Potential Legal Ramifications of Whole-Body CT Screening: Taking a Peek into Pandora's Box Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 317 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Herts, D. M. Coll, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, G. Linnell, S. L. Wirth, and M. E. Baker Enhancement Characteristics of Papillary Renal Neoplasms Revealed on Triphasic Helical CT of the Kidneys Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 367 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Bae, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, and H. F. Bennett Renal Cysts: Is Attenuation Artifactually Increased on Contrast-enhanced CT Images? Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 792 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. H. Coulam, D. H. Sheafor, R. A. Leder, E. K. Paulson, D. M. DeLong, and R. C. Nelson Evaluation of Pseudoenhancement of Renal Cysts During Contrast-Enhanced CT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 493 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]