AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harisinghani, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harisinghani, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1347-1351, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR lymphangiography using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic malignancies: radiographic- pathologic correlation

MG Harisinghani, S Saini, R Weissleder, PF Hahn, RK Yantiss, C Tempany, BJ Wood and PR Mueller
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to administer ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) and compare changes in signal intensity of lymph nodes in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic malignancies. Also, we correlated radiographic with pathologic findings. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with proven primary abdominal or pelvic cancer (prostatic [n = 10]; colonic [n = 5]; endometrial [n = 1]; Merkel cell tumor [n = 1]; lymphoma [n = 1]; seminoma [n = 1]) were enrolled as part of our phase II and phase III clinical trials. In these patients, 49 lymph nodes (mean size, 1.4 cm) revealed on CT or MR imaging were evaluated on T1-weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, and T2*-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T 24-36 hr after IV administration of USPIO. Quantitative analyses used measurements of unenhanced and enhanced region-of- interest values in lymph nodes. Qualitative assessment used subjective evaluation and classification of changes in signal intensity. All patients underwent lymph node biopsy or surgical dissection followed by histopathologic correlation. RESULTS: Of the 49 lymph nodes that were evaluated, 20 were benign and 29 were malignant. A decrease in nodal signal intensity on enhanced T2-weighted and T2*-weighted gradient-echo images was seen in 20 benign lymph nodes and two malignant lymph nodes. No appreciable signal change was noted in 27 of the 29 malignant lymph nodes. The mean signal intensity on fast spin-echo T2-weighted images for benign lymph nodes changed from 186.48 (unenhanced) to 73.66 (enhanced). Conversely, mean signal intensity for malignant lymph nodes was relatively unchanged from 191.17 (unenhanced) to 183.18 (enhanced). CONCLUSION: USPIO appears to be a useful MR contrast agent for characterizing benign and malignant lymph nodes based on the enhancement criteria evaluated in our study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V S Khoo and D L Joon
New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_1): S2 - S15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. M. L. L. G. Deserno, M. G. Harisinghani, M. Taupitz, G. J. Jager, J. A. Witjes, P. F. Mulders, C. A. Hulsbergen van de Kaa, D. Kaufmann, and J. O. Barentsz
Urinary Bladder Cancer: Preoperative Nodal Staging with Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 449 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. S. Deloire, T. Touil, B. Brochet, V. Dousset, J.-M. Caille, and K. G Petry
Macrophage brain infiltration in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is not completely compromised by suppressed T-cell invasion: in vivo magnetic resonance imaging illustration in effective anti-VLA-4 antibody treatment
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2004; 10(5): 540 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Torabi, S. L. Aquino, and M. G. Harisinghani
Current Concepts in Lymph Node Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1509 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, A. S. Glas, F. J. M. Slors, A. H. Zwinderman, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker
Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 773 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. G. Harisinghani, W. T. Dixon, M. A. Saksena, E. Brachtel, D. J. Blezek, P. J. Dhawale, M. Torabi, and P. F. Hahn
MR Lymphangiography: Imaging Strategies to Optimize the Imaging of Lymph Nodes with Ferumoxtran-10
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 867 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Anzai, C. W. Piccoli, E. K. Outwater, W. Stanford, D. A. Bluemke, P. Nurenberg, S. Saini, K. R. Maravilla, D. E. Feldman, U. P. Schmiedl, et al.
Evaluation of Neck and Body Metastases to Nodes with Ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR Imaging: Phase III Safety and Efficacy Study
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 777 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Frank, B. R. Miller, A. S. Arbab, H. A. Zywicke, E. K. Jordan, B. K. Lewis, L. H. Bryant Jr, and J. W. M. Bulte
Clinically Applicable Labeling of Mammalian and Stem Cells by Combining Superparamagnetic Iron Oxides and Transfection Agents
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 480 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. S. Siegelman
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 981 - 981.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. G. Harisinghani, J. Barentsz, P. F. Hahn, W. M. Deserno, S. Tabatabaei, C. H. van de Kaa, J. de la Rosette, and R. Weissleder
Noninvasive Detection of Clinically Occult Lymph-Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 19, 2003; 348(25): 2491 - 2499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Kundra and P. M. Silverman
Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Follow-Up of Cancer of the Urinary Bladder
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1045 - 1054.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson
New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. Kaim, T. Wischer, T. O'Reilly, G. Jundt, J. Frohlich, G. K. von Schulthess, and P. R. Allegrini
MR Imaging with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles in Experimental Soft-Tissue Infections in Rats
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. A. Sohaib, P. S. Richards, T. Ind, A. R. Jeyarajah, J. H. Shepherd, I. J. Jacobs, and R. H. Reznek
MR Imaging of Carcinoma of the Vulva
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 373 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Thornbury, D. K. Ornstein, P. L. Choyke, C. P. Langlotz, and J. C. Weinreb
Prostate Cancer: What Is the Future Role for Imaging?
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 17 - 22.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.