American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1485-1490, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients

I Boulay, P Holtz, WD Foley, B White and FP Begun
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether unenhanced helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis, supplemented as necessary with delayed enhanced CT of the pelvis, is sufficient for urologists to treat patients with acute renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans from 99 patients were analyzed retrospectively for the presence, size, and location of ureteral calculi and the presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction. Clinical follow-up was analyzed by reviewing charts, directly communicating with patients, and reviewing surgical reports. Clinical information was correlated with CT findings. RESULTS: The findings of 51 CT scans were positive for calculi, and the findings of 48 were negative for calculi. The findings from two CT scans were false-positive, and none of the findings were false- negative. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT were 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. A significant difference in stone size was found between patients who were treated conservatively (3.3 +/- 1.3 mm) and patients who underwent a urologic procedure (7 +/- 6.2 mm) (p < .01) and between patients in whom successful ureteral stent placement was the sole intervention (3.9 +/- 2.8 mm) and patients in whom initial stent placement failed and who then underwent a second urologic procedure (7.4 +/- 3 mm) (p < .05). We found no statistically significant difference between the conservatively and interventionally treated groups with respect to stone location. The presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Stone size alone was found to correlate with patient treatment. Stone location and the presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction did not affect patient treatment. Because the degree of obstruction and relative renal function are not relevant to the initial treatment of patients with ureteral stone obstruction, CT is adequate for both diagnosis and treatment.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-A. Poletti, A. Platon, O. T. Rutschmann, F. R. Schmidlin, C. E. Iselin, and C. D. Becker Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose CT Protocol in Patients with Clinically Suspected Renal Colic Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Mulkens, S. Daineffe, R. De Wijngaert, P. Bellinck, A. Leonard, G. Smet, and J.-L. Termote Urinary Stone Disease: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Low-Dose with 4D MDCT Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mitterberger, G. M. Pinggera, E. Maier, H. Neuwirt, R. Neururer, L. Pallwein, J. Gradl, G. Bartsch, H. Strasser, and F. Frauscher Value of 3-Dimensional Transrectal/ Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Distal Ureteral Calculi J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 19 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Goldman, S. Faintuch, S. A. Ajzen, D. M. J. Christofalo, M. P. Araujo, V. Ortiz, M. Srougi, P. J. Kenney, and J. Szejnfeld Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1251 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tack, S. Sourtzis, I. Delpierre, V. de Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 305 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. D. Foley Special Focus Session: Multidetector CT: Abdominal Visceral Imaging RadioGraphics, May 1, 2002; 22(3): 701 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Raby The role of CT in acute abdominal pain Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Georgiades, C. J. Moore, and D. P. Smith Differences of Renal Parenchymal Attenuation for Acutely Obstructed and Unobstructed Kidneys on Unenhanced Helical CT: A Useful Secondary Sign? Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 965 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Abramson, N. Walders, K. E. Applegate, R. C. Gilkeson, and M. R. Robbin Impact in the Emergency Department of Unenhanced CT on Diagnostic Confidence and Therapeutic Efficacy in Patients with Suspected Renal Colic: A Prospective Survey Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr. Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Assi, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, and M. Korobkin Sensitivity of CT Scout Radiography and Abdominal Radiography for Revealing Ureteral Calculi on Helical CT: Implications for Radiologic Follow-Up Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Morin, S. Sourtzis, W. D. Foley, D. R. Jacobsun, and F. P. Begun Helical CT and Renal Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 568 - 569. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Diagnosing Ureteral Stones by Helical CT Journal Watch (General), July 9, 1999; 1999(709): 2 - 2. [Full Text]

				K. A. B. Fowler, J. A. Locken, J. H. Duchesne, and M. R. Williamson US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sudah, R. L. Vanninen, K. Partanen, S. Kainulainen, A. Malinen, A. Heino, and M. Ala-Opas Patients with Acute Flank Pain: Comparison of MR Urography with Unenhanced Helical CT Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 98 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]