|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1491-1494, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
S Sourtzis, JF Thibeau, N Damry, A Raslan, M Vandendris and M Bellemans
Department of Radiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare unenhanced helical CT and excretory urography in the assessment of patients with renal colic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three of 70 consecutive patients with acute signs of renal colic were prospectively examined with unenhanced helical CT, which was followed immediately by excretory urography. Two radiologists who were unaware of the findings independently interpreted these examinations to determine the presence or absence of ureteral obstruction. On all CT scans that had positive findings for ureteral stones or obstruction, we looked for secondary signs of obstruction (perinephric or periureteral fat stranding, ureteral wall edema, ureteral dilatation, and blurring of renal sinus fat). RESULTS: A stone was recovered in 45 of the 53 patients, nine before and 36 after imaging. The latter 36 patients had their stones identified on CT, whereas only 24 patients had their stones identified on excretory urography. Eight patients without stone disease had normal ureters on both CT and excretory urography. Of the 45 patients who had stone disease, 26 had ureteral dilatation on both CT and excretory urography, and 36 patients who recovered a stone after CT had secondary signs of obstruction. Of the nine patients who recovered a stone before CT, three had secondary signs of obstruction. Two patients had periureteral fat stranding, ureteral wall edema, and renal sinus fat blurring. One patient had only ureteral wall edema. CONCLUSION: Compared with excretory urography, unenhanced helical CT is better for identifying ureteral stones in patients with acute ureterolithiasis. Secondary CT signs of obstruction, including renal sinus fat blurring, were frequently present even when the stone was eliminated before imaging.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A O'Keeffe, S. McNally, and M. T Keogan Investigating painless haematuria BMJ, July 9, 2008; 337(jul09_3): a260 - a260. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, S. A. Akbar, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, J. G. Bhagwat, and J. L. Seifter Multi-Detector Row CT Urography of Normal Urinary Collecting System: Furosemide versus Saline as Adjunct to Contrast Medium Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 749 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liu, K. J. Mortele, and S. G. Silverman Incidental Extraurinary Findings at MDCT Urography in Patients with Hematuria: Prevalence and Impact on Imaging Costs Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1051 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, P. Inampudi, J. H. Ellis, R. B. Shah, G. J. Faerber, and J. E. Montie MDCT Urography of Upper Tract Urothelial Neoplasms Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1873 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, A. Kawashima, and A. J. LeRoy Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S55 - S58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Goldman, S. Faintuch, S. A. Ajzen, D. M. J. Christofalo, M. P. Araujo, V. Ortiz, M. Srougi, P. J. Kenney, and J. Szejnfeld Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1251 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Cohen and R. S. Brown Microscopic Hematuria N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 2003; 348(23): 2330 - 2338. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tack, S. Sourtzis, I. Delpierre, V. de Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 305 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Raby The role of CT in acute abdominal pain Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Abramson, N. Walders, K. E. Applegate, R. C. Gilkeson, and M. R. Robbin Impact in the Emergency Department of Unenhanced CT on Diagnostic Confidence and Therapeutic Efficacy in Patients with Suspected Renal Colic: A Prospective Survey Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Frager Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1353 - 1354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr. Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Morin, S. Sourtzis, W. D. Foley, D. R. Jacobsun, and F. P. Begun Helical CT and Renal Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 568 - 569. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Diagnosing Ureteral Stones by Helical CT Journal Watch (General), July 9, 1999; 1999(709): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, G. J. Faerber, J. E. Montie, and J. H. Ellis Urinary Tract Abnormalities: Initial Experience with Multi-Detector Row CT Urography Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |