American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1501-1508, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath- hold imaging

U Hahn, S Miller, T Nagele, F Schick, B Erdtmann, S Duda and CD Claussen
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tubingen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of three different MR angiographic techniques at 1.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 22 patients with renal artery stenosis confirmed at intraarterial catheter angiography, we also performed unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced single breath-hold three- dimensional fast low-angle shot MR angiography. We determined circulation time to optimize signal acquisition in gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography after bolus injection of contrast material. RESULTS: Sensitivity, defined as the detection of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), was 85% for enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 91% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and 95% for unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography. The combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium- enhanced MR angiography yielded 100% sensitivity for hilar artery stenoses. There were 13 false-positive findings with unenhanced phase- contrast MR angiography, 10 with enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, and four with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (specificity: 38%, 52%, and 79%, respectively). Accessory renal arteries were not seen on unenhanced or enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography (0/8 patients) but were detected with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in five of the eight patients. Interobserver agreement (kappa = .62) was best with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The quality of the images was unsatisfactory for adequate evaluation of segmental renal arteries with all three MR angiographic techniques. CONCLUSION: A combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography at 1.0 T proved useful as a screening protocol for renal artery stenosis.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Miyazaki and V. S. Lee Nonenhanced MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 20 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. de Haan, J. M.A. van Engelshoven, A. J.H.M. Houben, D. W. Kaandorp, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, and P. W. de Leeuw Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification in Renal Arteries: Comparison With 133Xenon Washout Measurements Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 114 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Dong, S. O. Schoenberg, R. C. Carlos, M. Neimatallah, K. J. Cho, D. M. Williams, S. N. Kazanjian, and M. R. Prince Diagnosis of Renal Vascular Disease with MR Angiography RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1535 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]