| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 1627-1631, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
K Garg, H Sieler, CH Welsh, RJ Johnston and PD Russ
Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Colorado, Denver 80220, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the clinical usefulness of helical CT findings that are interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients underwent 132 helical CT examinations and 352 patients underwent ventilation-perfusion scanning for suspected acute pulmonary embolism over a 17-month period at a single institution. Findings from clinical follow-up at a minimum of 6 months were assessed, with a special focus on the presence of recurrent thromboembolism and mortality in 78 consecutive patients in whom helical CT findings were interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism and anticoagulant therapy was not administered (group I). During the same 17-month period, 46 patients underwent ventilation-perfusion scanning that was interpreted as normal (group II), and 132 patients underwent ventilation-perfusion scanning that was interpreted as showing a very low to low probability for pulmonary embolism (group III). Patients in groups II and III did not undergo helical CT or pulmonary angiography and did not receive anticoagulant therapy. However, clinical follow-up was solicited. Patients from groups II and III were used as control subjects. RESULTS: Nine patients in group I died, one of whom was found to have a microscopic pulmonary embolism at autopsy. In group II, four patients died, none of whom were shown to have a missed or recurrent pulmonary embolism. Of the 18 patients in group III who died, three had a recurrent or missed pulmonary embolism (mean interval, 9 days), and two were found to have deep vein thrombosis on sonography of the leg (mean interval, 12 weeks). Negative predictive values for helical CT, normal lung scanning, and low-probability ventilation-perfusion scanning were 99%, 100%, and 96%, respectively (p = .299). CT provided either additional findings or an alternate diagnosis in 42 (53.8%) of the 78 patients in whom helical CT findings had been interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: A helical CT scan can be effectively used to rule out clinically significant pulmonary emboli and may prevent further investigation or unnecessary treatment of most patients.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Quiroz, N. Kucher, K. H. Zou, F. Kipfmueller, P. Costello, S. Z. Goldhaber, and U. J. Schoepf Clinical Validity of a Negative Computed Tomography Scan in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review JAMA, April 27, 2005; 293(16): 2012 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. K. Moores, W. L. Jackson Jr., A. F. Shorr, and J. L. Jackson Meta-Analysis: Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Managed with Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography Ann Intern Med, December 7, 2004; 141(11): 866 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. J. Schoepf, S. Z. Goldhaber, and P. Costello Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2160 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Kanne and T. A. Lalani Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-15 - I-21. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. J. Schoepf and P. Costello CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: State of the Art Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Donato, J. J. Scheirer, M. S. Atwell, J. Gramp, and R. Duszak Jr Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Helical Computed Tomographic Results in Whom Anticoagulation Was Withheld Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2003; 163(17): 2033 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J.L. van Strijen, W. de Monye, J. Schiereck, G. J. Kieft, M. H. Prins, M. V. Huisman, P. M.T. Pattynama, and for the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating th Single-Detector Helical Computed Tomography as the Primary Diagnostic Test in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicenter Clinical Management Study of 510 Patients Ann Intern Med, February 18, 2003; 138(4): 307 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Bourriot, T. Couffinhal, V. Bernard, M. Montaudon, J. Bonnet, and F. Laurent Clinical Outcome After a Negative Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiographic Finding in an Inpatient Population From Cardiology and Pneumology Wards Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Beckh, P. L. Bolcskei, and K.-D. Lessnau Real-Time Chest Ultrasonography: A Comprehensive Review for the Pulmonologist Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1759 - 1773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Ginsberg, J. Oh, A. Welber, and D. M. Panicek Clinical Usefulness of Imaging Performed After CT Angiography That Was Negative for Pulmonary Embolus in a High-Risk Oncologic Population Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1205 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Mayo, L. H. Ketai, P. A. Loud, Z. D. Grossman, D. S. Katz, and A. M. Gittleman Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, October 1, 2002; 22(90001): S20 - 24. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Tillie-Leblond, I. Mastora, F. Radenne, S. Paillard, A.-B. Tonnel, J. Remy, and M. Remy-Jardin Risk of Pulmonary Embolism after a Negative Spiral CT Angiogram in Patients with Pulmonary Disease: 1-year Clinical Follow-up Study Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 461 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N.L. Muller Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: past, present and future Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 3S - 12s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Gupta, W. W. Mayo-Smith, M. B. Mainiero, D. E. Dupuy, and G. F. Abbott Helical CT of Pulmonary Vascular Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 487 - 492. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Pistolesi and M. Miniati Imaging techniques in treatment algorithms of pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 28S - 39s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Kazerooni Population and Sample Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 993 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. R. van Beek, E. M. J. Brouwers, Bing Song, A. H. H. Bongaerts, and M. Oudkerk Lung Scintigraphy and Helical Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. T. Pattynama, L. R Goodman, R. J. Lipchik, and P. K. Woodard Meaning of a Helical CT Angiogram Negative for Pulmonary Embolism Drs Goodman and Lipchik respond: Dr Woodard responds: Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 913 - 916. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Garg, J. L. Kemp, D. Wojcik, S. Hoehn, R. J. Johnston, L. C. Macey, and A. E. Baron Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of Combined CT Pulmonary Angiography and Venography with Bilateral Leg Sonography in 70 Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 997 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. R. Goodman 1999 Plenary Session: Friday Imaging Symposium : CT Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 1201 - 1205. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. P. Smith Pulmonary Embolism: What's Wrong with This Diagnosis? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1489 - 1497. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. K. Woodard CT Scan Negative for Pulmonary Embolism: Where Do We Go from Here? Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 325 - 326. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. R. Goodman, R. J. Lipchik, R. S. Kuzo, Y. Liu, T. L. McAuliffe, and D. J. O'Brien Subsequent Pulmonary Embolism: Risk after a Negative Helical CT Pulmonary Angiogram- Prospective Comparison with Scintigraphy Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 535 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Larcos and K. Garg Negative Findings on Helical CT in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 871 - 871. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. Rathbun, G. E. Raskob, and T. L. Whitsett Sensitivity and Specificity of Helical Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, February 1, 2000; 132(3): 227 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Raptopoulos and P. M. Boiselle Multi-Detector Row Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison with Single-Detector Row Spiral CT Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 606 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
