AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Won, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Won, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 227-229, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease

B Won, HE Reynolds, CL Lazaridis and VP Jackson
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum- assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p = .13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION: The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. P. Lourenco, M. B. Mainiero, E. Lazarus, D. Giri, and B. Schepps
Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Histologic Underestimation Rates with 11- and 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): W275 - W279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Lomoschitz, T. H. Helbich, M. Rudas, G. Pfarl, K. F. Linnau, A. Stadler, and R. J. Jackman
Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Influence of Number of Specimens on Diagnostic Accuracy
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 897 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. E. Philpotts, R. J. Hooley, and C. H. Lee
Comparison of Automated Versus Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods for Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, J. B. Kaplan, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, and D. D. Dershaw
To Excise or To Sample the Mammographic Target: What Is the Goal of Stereotactic II-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 679 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, E. Morris, C. F. Clark Jr., E. Liberty, and C. D. Lehman
Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1017 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, S. L. Goodstine, D. D. Dershaw, E. A. Morris, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and K. J. V. Zee
One Operation After Percutaneous Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Frequency and Associated Factors
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 673 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. F. Brem, J. M. Schoonjans, S. N. Goodman, A. Nolten, F. B. Askin, and O. M. B. Gatewood
Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Percutaneous Diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Devices
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 793 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. Jackman, F. Burbank, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, M. C. Lechner, T. R. Richardson, A. A. Smid, H. B. Borofsky, C. H. Lee, H. M. Goldstein, et al.
Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 497 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. Lee, D. Carter, L. E. Philpotts, M. E. Couce, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, and I. Tocino
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed with Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Can Invasion Be Predicted?
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 466 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. L. R. Darling, D. N. Smith, S. C. Lester, C. Kaelin, D.-L. G. Selland, C. M. Denison, P. J. DiPiro, D. I. Rose, E. Rhei, and J. E. Meyer
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1341 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. E. Philpotts, C. H. Lee, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, D. Carter, and I. Tocino
Underestimation of Breast Cancer with II-Gauge Vacuum Suction Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1047 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman and M. P. Sama
Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.