|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 95-101, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
A Huber, K Nikolaou, P Gonschior, A Knez, M Stehling and M Reiser
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Institut fur Radiologische Diagnostik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat-Munchen, Munich, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the value of respiratory-gated three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in identifying coronary arteries in healthy volunteers and in patients with proximal coronary artery stenosis and to compare the results with those of conventional coronary angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with coronary artery stenosis were examined on a 1.5-T scanner with a retrospectively respiratory-gated 3D gradient- echo sequence. Visualization of the main coronary arteries was analyzed after curved multiplanar reconstructions. A six-point grading system was used to evaluate 400 vessel segments. The assessment of stenosis was performed by two observers who were unaware of the results of conventional coronary angiography. RESULTS: The proximal, middle, and distal segments of the coronary arteries were completely identified with or without luminal irregularities in 55%, 47%, and 20%, respectively, of the healthy volunteers. For the 20 patients, results were 69%, 44%, and 20%, respectively. For the assessment of coronary artery stenoses (n = 53), sensitivity was 73% and specificity was 50% after evaluation of the MR angiograms of all patients. A sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 54% were found for evaluation of the MR coronary angiograms, with an image quality score of at least 3 (i.e., artery segments completely identified with major luminal irregularities). CONCLUSION: With the navigator echo MR imaging technique, a complete 3D visualization of the main coronary arteries was possible in cases with high image quality. However, further experience with and improvement of the navigator echo technique we used is necessary for reliable assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al. Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Muthupillai, J. Smink, S. Hong, R. Ravindran, V. V. Lee, and S. D. Flamm SENSE or k-MAG to accelerate free breathing navigator-guided coronary MR angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1669 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Heuschmid, A. Kuettner, S. Schroeder, T. Trabold, A. Feyer, M. D. Seemann, R. Kuzo, C. D. Claussen, and A. F. Kopp ECG-Gated 16-MDCT of the Coronary Arteries: Assessment of Image Quality and Accuracy in Detecting Stenoses Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1413 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Danias, A. Roussakis, and J. P.A. Ioannidis Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography: A meta-analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1867 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel CT of Coronary Artery Disease Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Dirksen, H. J. Lamb, P. Kunz, P. Robert, C. Corot, and A. de Roos Improved MR Coronary Angiography with Use of a New Rapid Clearance Blood Pool Contrast Agent in Pigs Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 802 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, K. Nikolaou, and C. Becker Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Current and Potential Future Concepts Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 2026 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Duerinckx Myocardial Viability Using MR Imaging: Is It Ready for Clinical Use? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1741 - 1743. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Polak MR Coronary Angiography: Are We There Yet? Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 649 - 650. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |