AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venta, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, Y. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venta, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, Y. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 309-316, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Imaging features of focal breast fibrosis: mammographic-pathologic correlation of noncalcified breast lesions

LA Venta, EL Wiley, H Gabriel and YT Adler
Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the spectrum of imaging and histologic findings of focal breast fibrosis with an emphasis on noncalcified lesions, thereby offering a means of confirming mammographic-pathologic concordance on core biopsy of this increasingly encountered diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 610 core needle biopsies revealed the histologic diagnosis of focal fibrosis in 89 (15%). Thirty-nine cases were excluded: 17 in which focal fibrosis was not the primary diagnosis and 22 in which calcifications were the main imaging findings. The 50 remaining patients with noncalcified lesions that proved on histology to be focal fibrosis constituted the basis of the study. RESULTS: Mammographically, focal fibrosis presented as a mass in 68% of patients (n = 34), architectural distortion in 12% (n = 6), and asymmetric density in 10% (n = 5); focal fibrosis was mammographically occult in 10% (n = 5). Sonographically, 72% (n = 36) of cases of focal fibrosis presented as masses with three echo texture patterns: hypoechoic, isoechoic, and centrally echogenic with a peripheral hypoechoic rim. The sonographic margins were well circumscribed (n = 21), lobulated (n = 10), or ill defined (n = 5). Histologic review revealed three morphologic patterns of collagen deposition: perilobular, septal, and haphazard fibrosis. Correlation with the imaging findings showed that septal and perilobular fibrosis most often presented as hypoechoic or centrally echogenic masses, whereas the haphazard form was more often seen with architectural distortion. CONCLUSION: Focal fibrosis often presents as a noncalcified mass on mammography or sonography. The diagnosis of focal fibrosis on core needle biopsy can be considered concordant for a mass exhibiting well-circumscribed or partially obscured margins. Imaging findings discordant with focal fibrosis, such as marginal spiculation, require excisional biopsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. B. Goel, T. E. Knight, S. Pandey, M. Riddick-Young, E. S. de Paredes, and A. Trivedi
Fibrous Lesions of the Breast: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1547 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. K. You, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, M. J. Kim, K. K. Oh, B.-W. Park, and W. I. Yang
Focal Fibrosis of the Breast Diagnosed by a Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Imaging Findings and Clinical Relevance
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1377 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Weinstein, E. F. Conant, and G. Acs
Case 59: Angiolipoma of the Breast
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 773 - 775.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill and W. A. Berg
Case 39: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 132 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sklair-Levy, T. H. Samuels, C. Catzavelos, P. Hamilton, and R. Shumak
Stromal Fibrosis of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 573 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Guenin, C. H. Lee, L. E. Philpotts, L. J. Horvath, and I. Tocino
The Low False-Negative Rate for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Dr Lee and colleagues respond:
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 609 - 610.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Hall, L. A. Venta, H. Gabriel, Y. T. Adler, and E. L. Wiley
Focal Fibrosis of the Breast in Diabetes
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 870 - 870.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.