American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 1323-1329, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram

CH Lee, RC Smith, JA Levine, RN Troiano and I Tocino
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of MR imaging of the breast as an adjunct to mammography in problematic cases in which the significance, presence, or location of an abnormality could not be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1993 through February 1998, 86 lesions for which histologic or mammographic follow-up was available were evaluated by breast MR imaging because of equivocal findings on mammography. MR studies were performed with a dedicated breast multicoil on a 1.5-T scanner. Early studies were done using a T1-weighted two-dimensional spin-echo sequence before and after the administration of contrast material. Later studies were performed using a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient sequence with fat suppression. Studies were considered to be positive for an abnormality if a focal area of enhancement was seen after contrast administration. RESULTS: MR imaging had positive findings in 38 sites. Twenty-six of these sites corresponded in location to the mammographic abnormality that had prompted the recommendation for MR imaging. The remaining 12 sites occurred in areas not suspected mammographically. At biopsy, 10 (26%) of the 38 positive sites were malignant. MR imaging had negative findings at 60 other sites that had been suspected mammographically. Of these 60 sites, six were treated with excision, all with benign results; the remaining 54 sites showed mammographic stability on follow- up that ranged from 5 to 66 months (mean, 19 months). CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the breast can be a valuable adjunct to mammography for selected problematic cases.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Orel Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation? J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles Developing Asymmetry Identified on Mammography: Correlation with Imaging Outcome and Pathologic Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 667 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Brenner, E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, and D. D. Dershaw Needle Localization of Breast Lesions: Localizing Data Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179 (6): 1643 - 1644. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. D. Dershaw, J. B. Kaplan, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. J. Ballon Preoperative MR Imaging--Guided Needle Localization of Breast Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1211 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brown, R. C. Smith, and C. H. Lee Incidental Enhancing Lesions Found on MR Imaging of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1249 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]